Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
100Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $397.91M | $51.45M | $0.58 |
| 2024 | $289.28M | $14.67M | $0.16 |
| 2023 | $242.37M | $15.40M | $0.17 |
| 2022 | $264.22M | $-23.00M | $-0.26 |
| 2021 | $209.99M | $3.11M | $0.04 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Mon, Nov 2(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $0.15 per share
Typical surprise +24.2% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Mon, Aug 3$0.17 vs $0.16beat
- Wed, May 6$0.17 vs $0.14beat
- Tue, Feb 24$0.09 vs $0.09beat
- Mon, Nov 3$0.19 vs $0.10beat
- Mon, Aug 4$0.18 vs $0.10beat
- Wed, May 7$0.12 vs $0.06beat
Estimates and results for FPLSF via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from FPLSF's reported EPS growth of 98.6% a year over 4 years. Historical EPS growth of 99% reflects a recovery from a low base and won't persist. Capped at 30% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $2.14
- Implied price
- $49.33
- Return from $22.35
- 17.2% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $24.53 — today's price is already 8.9% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 17 | 20 | 23 | 26 | 29 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.0% | 1.8% | 5.2% | 8.1% | 10.8% | 13.3% |
| 25.0% | 6.0% | 9.5% | 12.7% | 15.4% | 18.0% |
| 30.0% | 10.3% | 13.9% | 17.2% | 20.1% | 22.7% |
| 35.0% | 14.5% | 18.3% | 21.7% | 24.7% | 27.4% |
| 40.0% | 18.8% | 22.7% | 26.2% | 29.3% | 32.2% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newsmarketbeat.com·5d ago·Neutral
5N Plus Q2 Earnings Call Highlights 5N Plus TSE: VNP reported higher second-quarter revenue and earnings as demand remained strong across its renewable energy, space solar power and bismuth-based product markets, though higher input costs and temporary operating inefficiencies pressured margins.
View source ↗