Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
100Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $174.70M | $1.96M | $0.02 |
| 2024 | $184.51M | $7.64M | $0.08 |
| 2023 | $187.99M | $-9.90M | $-0.11 |
| 2022 | $215.53M | $-115.99M | $-1.36 |
| 2021 | $193.15M | $60.38M | $0.93 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Thu, Nov 5(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $0.02 per share
Typical surprise -50.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Aug 6$0.02 vs $0.03miss
- Mon, May 11$0.01 vs $0.03miss
- Thu, Mar 12$-0.03 vs $0.03miss
- Thu, Nov 6$0.02 vs $0.04miss
- Thu, Aug 7$0.01 vs $0.04miss
- Thu, May 8$0.02 vs $0.02beat
Estimates and results for MAPS via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from MAPS's reported EPS growth of -62.5% a year over 4 years. Historical EPS growth of -62% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.01
- Implied price
- $0.37
- Return from $0.40
- -1.8% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $0.18 — -54.5% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 31 | 38 | 45 | 52 | 59 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -19.6% | -16.2% | -13.3% | -10.8% | -8.5% |
| -20.0% | -14.2% | -10.6% | -7.6% | -4.8% | -2.4% |
| -15.0% | -8.8% | -5.0% | -1.8% | 1.1% | 3.7% |
| -10.0% | -3.5% | 0.5% | 4.0% | 7.1% | 9.8% |
| -5.0% | 1.9% | 6.1% | 9.8% | 13.0% | 15.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newsglobenewswire.com·6h ago·Neutral
The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. Announces Proposed Class Action Settlement on Behalf of Purchasers of WM Technology, Inc. Securities LOS ANGELES, Aug. 15, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. announces that the United States District Court for the Central District of California has approved the following announcement of a proposed class action settlement that would benefit purchasers of WM Technology, Inc. securities (MAPS and MAPSW):
View source ↗