Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$53.98M+339.28%Company Profile
- CEO
- Christian Pittard
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Asset Management
- Beta
- 0.77
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 4 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.94
Financials
Revenue
$53.98M+339.3%Net Income
$29.25M+19.9%EBITDA
$34.84M+243.5%Free Cash Flow
$33.96M+669.4%EPS (diluted)
$0.22-88.2%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
125.47M+859.7%Operating Expenses
$0.00Cash & Debt
$27.41MReturn of Capital
$59.40MDividend per Share
$0.08Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $57.84M | $40.56M | $0.33 |
| 2024 | $79.30M | $77.91M | $1.24 |
| 2023 | $-19.67M | $30.27M | $1.04 |
| 2022 | $32.92M | $-59.72M | $-2.49 |
| 2021 | $30.62M | $34.99M | $1.46 |
| 2020 | $-1.20M | $-4.10M | $-0.22 |
| 2019 | $-1.48M | $-2.26M | $-0.17 |
| 2018 | $4.45M | $3.48M | $0.27 |
| 2017 | $27.90M | $26.88M | $2.06 |
| 2016 | $7.04M | $16.55M | $1.09 |
| 2015 | $25.42M | $-16.76M | $-1.28 |
| 2014 | $27.60M | $13.25M | $1.01 |
| 2013 | $23.25M | $26.86M | $2.05 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from ACP's reported EPS growth of -14.1% a year over 12 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.16
- Implied price
- $2.80
- Return from $5.14
- -11.4% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $1.39 — -72.9% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 11 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -24.1% | -28.3% | -24.7% | -21.7% | -19.1% | -16.9% |
| -19.1% | -23.5% | -19.8% | -16.6% | -13.8% | -11.4% |
| -14.1% | -18.8% | -14.8% | -11.4% | -8.5% | -5.9% |
| -9.1% | -14.1% | -9.8% | -6.3% | -3.2% | -0.4% |
| -4.1% | -9.4% | -4.9% | -1.1% | 2.2% | 5.1% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
83Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·7h ago·Negative
ACP: NAV Erosion Will Continue Abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund remains a sell due to persistent earnings shortfalls and ongoing NAV erosion. ACP's 17.9% yield is unsustainable, with 42% of distributions funded by return of capital, signaling likely payout cuts ahead. The fund's high leverage (32.08%) and heavy exposure to below-investment-grade debt amplify downside risk in a challenging credit environment.
View source ↗
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by ACP officers and directors.
- Bought
- $170k
- Sold
- —
14 trades
0 trades
- Porter Rahn Kbought
- Malone Peter Geraldbought
- Reit Toddbought
- Yao Nancybought
- Bird Stephenbought
- Maasbach Nancy Yaobought
- Maasbach Nancy Yaobought
- Takian Randybought
86 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
