Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$16.17M-24.26%Company Profile
- CEO
- Randall D. Sampson
- Sector
- Consumer Cyclical
- Industry
- Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
- Employees
- 480
- Beta
- -0.39
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 5 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 2.80
Financials
Revenue
$16.17M-24.3%Net Income
$-148.1K-105.4%EBITDA
$798.5K-82.7%Free Cash Flow
$3.57MEPS (diluted)
$-0.03-105.2%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
5.15M+7.7%Operating Expenses
$2.03MCash & Debt
$19.03MReturn of Capital
$365.5KRevenue by Segment (annual)
$59.57MDividend per Share
$0.07Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $59.57M | $-529.4K | $-0.10 |
| 2024 | $61.56M | $2.11M | $0.42 |
| 2023 | $61.44M | $10.56M | $2.15 |
| 2022 | $66.82M | $7.51M | $1.55 |
| 2021 | $60.40M | $11.80M | $2.47 |
| 2020 | $33.14M | $1.06M | $0.23 |
| 2019 | $59.23M | $2.72M | $0.59 |
| 2018 | $59.14M | $5.72M | $1.28 |
| 2017 | $56.95M | $4.09M | $0.93 |
| 2016 | $52.46M | $4.20M | $0.98 |
| 2015 | $52.26M | $2.73M | $0.65 |
| 2014 | $48.47M | $2.41M | $0.58 |
| 2013 | $46.74M | $1.02M | $0.24 |
| 2012 | $45.46M | $1.02M | $0.25 |
Valuation
CPHChas no positive reported earnings per share, so an earnings-multiple projection can't be built for it. Companies are valued on other measures at this stage — revenue growth, cash burn, or book value — none of which this calculator models.
Signal Score (90d)
80Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newszacks.com·5h ago·Negative
Canterbury Park Q2 Loss Narrows Y/Y on Revenue & EBITDA Growth CPHC's Q2 revenues rise 3.2% y/y and adjusted EBITDA jumps 29.3%, while its net loss narrows despite higher operating expenses.
View source ↗
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by CPHC officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- —
1 trade
0 trades
- Chronister Markbought
99 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.