Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$44.23M-32.15%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Kathryn Johnbull
- Sector
- Industrials
- Industry
- Specialty Business Services
- Employees
- 2,300
- Beta
- 1.46
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 3 / 9 (Weak)
- Altman Z-score
- 1.10
Financials
Revenue
$44.23M-32.2%Net Income
$-16.79M-682.1%EBITDA
$-353.0K-106.0%Free Cash Flow
$4.20M-86.1%EPS (diluted)
$-1.17-657.1%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
14.39M+5.4%Operating Expenses
$7.34MCash & Debt
$235.0KReturn of Capital
$93.0KRevenue by Segment (annual)
$270.81MQuote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $344.50M | $1.36M | $0.09 |
| 2024 | $395.94M | $7.40M | $0.52 |
| 2023 | $375.87M | $1.46M | $0.11 |
| 2022 | $395.17M | $23.29M | $1.82 |
| 2021 | $246.09M | $10.14M | $0.81 |
| 2020 | $209.19M | $7.11M | $0.58 |
| 2019 | $160.39M | $5.32M | $0.44 |
| 2018 | $133.24M | $1.84M | $0.14 |
| 2017 | $115.66M | $3.29M | $0.29 |
| 2016 | $85.60M | $3.38M | $0.34 |
| 2015 | $65.35M | $8.73M | $0.91 |
| 2014 | $60.49M | $5.36M | $0.56 |
| 2013 | $53.51M | $-159.0K | $-0.02 |
| 2012 | $49.19M | $-2.03M | $-0.14 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.14
- Implied price
- $8.35
- Return from $4.52
- 13.0% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $4.15 — -8.2% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 42 | 51 | 60 | 69 | 78 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -4.5% | -0.7% | 2.6% | 5.5% | 8.1% |
| 3.0% | 0.4% | 4.4% | 7.8% | 10.9% | 13.6% |
| 8.0% | 5.3% | 9.4% | 13.0% | 16.3% | 19.1% |
| 13.0% | 10.1% | 14.5% | 18.3% | 21.6% | 24.7% |
| 18.0% | 15.0% | 19.6% | 23.5% | 27.0% | 30.2% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
80Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsglobenewswire.com·1d ago·Negative
DLH to Provide Mission-Critical Cyber Support for U.S. Navy ATLANTA, Aug. 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- DLH Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: DLHC) (“DLH” or the “Company”), a leading provider of digital transformation and cybersecurity, systems engineering and integration, and science research and development, today announced it has been awarded a multiple-award indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“MAC ID/IQ”) contract to provide technical services in support of cyberspace activities for the U.S. Nav…
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Dec 9(in 4 months)
Consensus estimate $-0.28 per share
Typical surprise -14.3% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$-1.16 vs $-0.17miss
- Wed, May 6$-0.17 vs $-0.16miss
- Mon, Feb 9$-0.09 vs $-0.07miss
- Wed, Dec 10$-0.06 vs $0.02miss
- Wed, Aug 6$0.02 vs $0.02beat
- Wed, May 7$0.06 vs $0.07miss
Estimates and results for DLHC via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by DLHC officers and directors.
- Bought
- $2.4m
- Sold
- —
86 trades
0 trades
- Mink Brook Asset Management Llcbought
- Mink Brook Asset Management Llcbought
- Mink Brook Asset Management Llcbought
- Mink Brook Asset Management Llcbought
- Mink Brook Asset Management Llcbought
- Mink Brook Asset Management Llcbought
- Mink Brook Asset Management Llcbought
- Mink Brook Asset Management Llcbought
14 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.