Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$35.39B+72.69%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Yi Xiao Cheng
- Sector
- Communication Services
- Industry
- Internet Content & Information
- Employees
- 24,202
- Beta
- 1.28
- Country
- CN
- Piotroski score
- 4 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.28
Financials
Revenue
$35.39B+72.7%Net Income
$3.13BEBITDA
$5.51BFree Cash Flow
—EPS (diluted)
$0.75Shares Outstanding (diluted)
4.37B+5.7%Operating Expenses
$14.02BCash & Debt
$80.63BReturn of Capital
$0.00Dividend per Share
$0.09Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $139.09B | $18.14B | $4.27 |
| 2024 | $126.90B | $15.34B | $3.56 |
| 2023 | $113.47B | $6.40B | $1.48 |
| 2022 | $94.18B | $-13.69B | $-3.22 |
| 2021 | $81.08B | $-78.07B | $-18.47 |
| 2020 | $58.78B | $-116.64B | $-28.04 |
| 2019 | $39.12B | $-19.65B | $-4.73 |
| 2018 | $20.30B | $-12.43B | $-3.03 |
| 2017 | $8.34B | $-20.04B | $-4.88 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $6.22
- Implied price
- $87.15
- Return from $5.40
- 74.4% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $43.33 — today's price is already 87.5% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 10 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | 48.0% | 53.5% | 58.3% | 62.5% | 66.4% |
| 3.0% | 55.5% | 61.3% | 66.3% | 70.8% | 74.9% |
| 8.0% | 63.1% | 69.1% | 74.4% | 79.1% | 83.4% |
| 13.0% | 70.6% | 76.9% | 82.5% | 87.4% | 91.9% |
| 18.0% | 78.2% | 84.8% | 90.6% | 95.7% | 100.4% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
90Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·6h ago·Negative
Kuaishou: The AI Potential Vs. Advertising Reality Kuaishou is rated neutral as Q2 results reveal revenue in line but earnings miss, pressured by AI investments and slow online marketing. KUASF's Kling AI shows strong growth (+200% y/y) but remains only ~2% of total revenue, limiting near-term impact on overall financials. Core e-commerce and online marketing face headwinds from weak Chinese macroeconomics, soft consumer demand, and intense competition, constraining margin and growth outlook.
View source ↗
Earnings
Tue, Nov 24(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $0.02 per share
Typical surprise +0.8% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Aug 19$0.11 vs $0.13miss
- Wed, May 27$0.10 vs $0.09beat
- Wed, Mar 25$0.17 vs $0.17beat
- Wed, Nov 19$0.14 vs $0.15miss
- Thu, Aug 21$0.18 vs $0.16beat
- Tue, May 27$0.14 vs $0.14beat
Estimates and results for KUASF via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.