Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$253.47M+71.94%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Yogesh K. Gupta
- Sector
- Technology
- Industry
- Software - Infrastructure
- Employees
- 2,801
- Beta
- 0.81
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 8 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 1.27
Financials
Revenue
$253.47M+71.9%Net Income
$21.07M-32.0%EBITDA
$47.15M-20.3%Free Cash Flow
$76.97M+122.5%EPS (diluted)
$0.50-28.6%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
42.52M-4.5%Operating Expenses
$135.42MCash & Debt
$102.98MReturn of Capital
$34.85MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$977.83MDividend per Share
$0.17Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $977.83M | $73.13M | $1.70 |
| 2024 | $753.41M | $68.44M | $1.58 |
| 2023 | $694.44M | $70.20M | $1.62 |
| 2022 | $602.01M | $95.07M | $2.19 |
| 2021 | $531.31M | $78.42M | $1.79 |
| 2020 | $442.15M | $79.72M | $1.78 |
| 2019 | $413.30M | $26.40M | $0.59 |
| 2018 | $397.17M | $63.49M | $1.39 |
| 2017 | $397.57M | $37.42M | $0.78 |
| 2016 | $405.34M | $-55.73M | $-1.13 |
| 2015 | $377.55M | $-8.80M | $-0.17 |
| 2014 | $332.53M | $49.46M | $0.97 |
| 2013 | $334.00M | $74.91M | $1.37 |
| 2012 | $335.20M | $47.44M | $0.75 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from PRGS's reported EPS growth of 6.5% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $2.33
- Implied price
- $58.26
- Return from $43.22
- 6.2% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $28.97 — -33.0% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 17 | 21 | 25 | 29 | 33 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3.5% | -11.0% | -7.1% | -3.8% | -0.9% | 1.7% |
| 1.5% | -6.3% | -2.3% | 1.2% | 4.2% | 6.9% |
| 6.5% | -1.7% | 2.5% | 6.2% | 9.4% | 12.2% |
| 11.5% | 2.9% | 7.3% | 11.1% | 14.5% | 17.5% |
| 16.5% | 7.5% | 12.1% | 16.1% | 19.6% | 22.8% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
113Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newszacks.com·1d ago·Positive
Progress Software (PRGS) Upgraded to Buy: Here's What You Should Know Progress Software (PRGS) might move higher on growing optimism about its earnings prospects, which is reflected by its upgrade to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).
View source ↗ - Newsglobenewswire.com·1d ago·Neutral
Progress Software Appoints Bridget Collins as Chief Information Officer Accomplished technology executive to lead enterprise IT strategy, AI acceleration, cybersecurity and M&A integration BURLINGTON, Mass., Aug. 18, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Progress Software (Nasdaq: PRGS), an AI infrastructure software leader, today announced the appointment of Bridget Collins as Chief Information Officer (CIO).
View source ↗
Earnings
Mon, Sep 28(in 6 weeks)
Consensus estimate $1.49 per share
Typical surprise +9.9% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Tue, Jun 30$1.62 vs $1.49beat
- Mon, Mar 30$1.60 vs $1.57beat
- Tue, Jan 20$1.51 vs $1.31beat
- Mon, Sep 29$1.50 vs $1.30beat
- Mon, Jun 30$1.40 vs $1.30beat
- Mon, Mar 31$1.31 vs $1.06beat
Estimates and results for PRGS via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by PRGS officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $2.1m
0 trades
11 trades
- Folger Anthonysold
- Jarrett Lorensold
- Jarrett Lorensold
- Subramanian Sundarsold
- Folger Anthonysold
- Folger Anthonysold
- Wang Yufan Stephaniesold
- Wang Yufan Stephaniesold
89 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.