Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$165.85M+241.16%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Bobby D. Riley
- Sector
- Energy
- Industry
- Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
- Employees
- 122
- Beta
- 0.94
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 8 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 1.70
Financials
Revenue
$165.85M+241.2%Net Income
$87.37M+458.1%EBITDA
$77.64M+257.0%Free Cash Flow
$-4.79M-168.6%EPS (diluted)
$4.11+413.8%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
21.25M+8.8%Operating Expenses
$13.10MCash & Debt
$20.69MReturn of Capital
$11.39MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$388.66MDividend per Share
$0.40Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $391.98M | $160.84M | $7.61 |
| 2024 | $410.18M | $88.90M | $4.29 |
| 2023 | $375.05M | $111.59M | $5.66 |
| 2022 | $321.74M | $118.01M | $6.04 |
| 2021 | $151.04M | $-65.67M | $-4.19 |
| 2020 | $3.04M | $-3.65M | $-0.49 |
| 2019 | $4.91M | $-436.0K | $-0.49 |
| 2018 | $5.87M | $1.57M | $1.77 |
| 2017 | $5.26M | $-574.0K | $-0.68 |
| 2016 | $4.67M | $-4.20M | $-8.27 |
| 2015 | $6.16M | $-24.72M | $-48.76 |
| 2014 | $13.79M | $-788.0K | $-1.55 |
| 2013 | $15.70M | $2.82M | $5.64 |
| 2012 | $20.56M | $-67.0K | $-0.13 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $11.18
- Implied price
- $33.55
- Return from $37.78
- -2.3% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $16.68 — -55.9% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | -1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | — | -28.9% | -11.4% | -1.9% | 5.0% |
| 3.0% | — | -25.2% | -6.9% | 3.1% | 10.3% |
| 8.0% | — | -21.6% | -2.3% | 8.2% | 15.7% |
| 13.0% | — | -18.0% | 2.2% | 13.2% | 21.0% |
| 18.0% | — | -14.4% | 6.7% | 18.2% | 26.4% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
123Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·6h ago·Positive
Riley Exploration Permian: An Excellent Growth Prospect With More Room To Run Riley Exploration Permian (REPX) is rated a buy, driven by robust Q2 results, strong management execution, and a compelling risk/reward profile. REPX trades at a relative discount to peers and its historical multiples, with a superior balance sheet and attractive dividend yield. Production guidance was raised to 22,500-23,500 bbl/d (30% YoY growth), supported by outperformance at Silverback and upcoming infrastructure …
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Nov 4(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $1.84 per share
Typical surprise -0.6% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Aug 5$2.55 vs $1.63beat
- Wed, May 6$1.02 vs $1.10miss
- Wed, Mar 4$1.35 vs $0.83beat
- Wed, Nov 5$0.77 vs $0.97miss
- Wed, Aug 6$1.44 vs $1.00beat
- Wed, May 7$1.62 vs $1.63miss
Estimates and results for REPX via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by REPX officers and directors.
- Bought
- $790k
- Sold
- $77.6m
2 trades
59 trades
- Riley Philip Asold
- Riley Corey Neilsold
- Riley Corey Neilsold
- Riley Bobbysold
- Riley Bobbysold
- Riley Bobbysold
- Riley Corey Neilsold
- Riley Corey Neilsold
39 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.