Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$1.15B+17.74%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- David Sewell
- Sector
- Basic Materials
- Industry
- Chemicals - Specialty
- Employees
- 4,100
- Beta
- 0.49
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 2.60
Financials
Revenue
$1.15B+17.7%Net Income
$119.00M-23.2%EBITDA
$279.00M+3.9%Free Cash Flow
$123.00M+5.6%EPS (diluted)
$0.75-23.5%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
159.30M+0.4%Operating Expenses
$147.00MCash & Debt
$750.00MReturn of Capital
$12.00MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$3.89BDividend per Share
$0.07Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.89B | $237.00M | $1.49 |
| 2024 | $3.77B | $422.00M | $2.66 |
| 2023 | $3.65B | $621.00M | $3.91 |
| 2022 | $3.59B | $718.00M | $4.52 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from SOLS's reported EPS growth of -30.9% a year over 3 years. Historical EPS growth of -31% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.66
- Implied price
- $21.82
- Return from $57.44
- -17.6% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $10.85 — -81.1% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 23 | 28 | 33 | 38 | 43 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -32.4% | -29.6% | -27.3% | -25.2% | -23.3% |
| -20.0% | -27.9% | -25.0% | -22.4% | -20.2% | -18.2% |
| -15.0% | -23.3% | -20.3% | -17.6% | -15.2% | -13.1% |
| -10.0% | -18.8% | -15.6% | -12.8% | -10.3% | -8.0% |
| -5.0% | -14.3% | -10.9% | -7.9% | -5.3% | -2.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
100Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- News (RSS)coindesk·4h ago·Neutral
Crypto Long & Short: Where DeFi yield really comes from (and why it broke this spring) In this week's Crypto Long & Short, Solstice Finance's David Plisek argues that most of the money lost in DeFi this spring wasn't taken by hackers but by yield strategies that quietly stopped working. Looking at April's $13 billion drawdown, he shows that a headline yield number reveals almost nothing about whether it will hold under stress, laying out four questions an allocator should ask before committing c
View source ↗
Earnings
Thu, Oct 29(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.72 per share
Typical surprise +0.7% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Jul 30$0.88 vs $0.77beat
- Wed, May 6$0.63 vs $0.61beat
- Wed, Feb 11$0.26 vs $0.40miss
- Thu, Nov 6$0.53 vs $0.54miss
Estimates and results for SOLS via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by SOLS officers and directors.
No open-market trades in the recent filings. All 100 recent Form 4 entries were share awards, option exercises or tax withholding — pay, not decisions to buy or sell.
100 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.