Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
100Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $523.85M | $18.48M | $0.42 |
| 2025 | $474.66M | $13.43M | $0.30 |
| 2024 | $535.83M | $39.61M | $0.86 |
| 2023 | $479.24M | $36.88M | $0.80 |
| 2022 | $864.13M | $194.49M | $4.12 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Thu, Sep 3(in 2 weeks)
Consensus estimate $-0.06 per share
Typical surprise -13.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jun 17$0.36 vs $0.23beat
- Thu, Mar 5$0.08 vs $0.04beat
- Thu, Dec 4$0.04 vs $0.05miss
- Thu, Sep 4$-0.08 vs $0.02miss
- Wed, Jun 18$0.20 vs $0.23miss
- Thu, Mar 6$0.02 vs $0.02beat
Estimates and results for SWBI via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by SWBI officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $462k
0 trades
9 trades
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Mcpherson Deana Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
91 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from SWBI's reported EPS growth of -43.5% a year over 4 years. Historical EPS growth of -43% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.18
- Implied price
- $6.81
- Return from $14.33
- -13.8% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $3.39 — -76.4% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 25 | 31 | 37 | 43 | 49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -29.7% | -26.6% | -24.0% | -21.6% | -19.6% |
| -20.0% | -25.0% | -21.7% | -18.9% | -16.4% | -14.2% |
| -15.0% | -20.3% | -16.8% | -13.8% | -11.2% | -8.8% |
| -10.0% | -15.6% | -11.9% | -8.7% | -6.0% | -3.5% |
| -5.0% | -10.9% | -7.0% | -3.7% | -0.7% | 1.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newsdefenseworld.net·6h ago·Neutral
Analyzing Smith & Wesson Brands (NASDAQ:SWBI) and JAKKS Pacific (NASDAQ:JAKK) JAKKS Pacific (NASDAQ: JAKK - Get Free Report) and Smith and Wesson Brands (NASDAQ: SWBI - Get Free Report) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk and valuation. Insider and Institutional Ownership
View source ↗