Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Analyst Ratings
4 analystsRevenue
$112.59M-51.79%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Mark Peter Smith
- Sector
- Industrials
- Industry
- Aerospace & Defense
- Employees
- 1,382
- Beta
- 0.87
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 7 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 5.27
Financials
Revenue
$112.59M-51.8%Net Income
$2.59M-92.0%EBITDA
$11.92M-81.8%Free Cash Flow
$-20.77M-234.3%EPS (diluted)
$0.06-90.0%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
45.48M-20.4%Operating Expenses
$28.05MCash & Debt
$25.23MReturn of Capital
$5.96MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$523.85MDividend per Share
$0.13Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $523.85M | $18.48M | $0.42 |
| 2025 | $474.66M | $13.43M | $0.30 |
| 2024 | $535.83M | $39.61M | $0.86 |
| 2023 | $479.24M | $36.88M | $0.80 |
| 2022 | $864.13M | $194.49M | $4.12 |
| 2021 | $1.06B | $252.05M | $4.62 |
| 2020 | $678.39M | $-61.23M | $-1.11 |
| 2019 | $638.28M | $18.41M | $0.34 |
| 2018 | $606.85M | $20.13M | $0.37 |
| 2017 | $903.19M | $127.85M | $2.29 |
| 2016 | $722.91M | $93.96M | $1.72 |
| 2015 | $551.86M | $49.61M | $0.92 |
| 2014 | $626.62M | $89.31M | $1.52 |
| 2013 | $587.51M | $78.71M | $1.21 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from SWBI's reported EPS growth of -7.8% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.28
- Implied price
- $10.23
- Return from $14.64
- -6.9% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $5.09 — -65.3% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 25 | 31 | 37 | 43 | 49 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -17.8% | -23.3% | -19.9% | -17.0% | -14.5% | -12.2% |
| -12.8% | -18.6% | -15.0% | -12.0% | -9.3% | -6.9% |
| -7.8% | -13.9% | -10.2% | -6.9% | -4.1% | -1.5% |
| -2.8% | -9.3% | -5.3% | -1.9% | 1.1% | 3.8% |
| 2.2% | -4.6% | -0.4% | 3.2% | 6.3% | 9.1% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
75+50.00%Social Signal Score
Mentions (6)
- Newszacks.com·13d ago·Positive
All You Need to Know About Smith & Wesson (SWBI) Rating Upgrade to Buy Smith & Wesson (SWBI) might move higher on growing optimism about its earnings prospects, which is reflected by its upgrade to a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·31d ago·Positive
Smith & Wesson Q1 Earnings: Rising Spending Weighs On The Balance Sheet Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. earns a Buy rating as demand and market share improve despite ongoing industry cyclicality. Q1 net sales rose 32.3% year-over-year to $113 million, with gross margin up to 28.7%, but underlying margin gains were partly driven by one-off tariff refunds. Full-year revenue guidance targets 5–7% growth, reflecting management's expectation of softer demand in the second half after a regulatory-driven Q
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·32d ago·Positive
I Have To Pull This Trigger On Smith & Wesson (Rating Upgrade) Smith & Wesson is upgraded from 'hold' to 'buy' following a strong Q1 FY2027 and attractive valuation. Q1 revenue surged 32.3% year over year, driven by robust handgun and long gun demand, innovation, and favorable product mix. Recent NICS background check data and management commentary indicate strengthening end-user demand and successful new product introductions.
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·32d ago·Positive
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) Q1 2027 Earnings Call Transcript Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) Q1 2027 Earnings Call Transcript
View source ↗ - Newsmarketbeat.com·32d ago·Negative
Smith & Wesson Brands Q1 Earnings Call Highlights Smith & Wesson Brands NASDAQ: SWBI reported higher first-quarter fiscal 2027 sales and a return to profitability, citing demand across its consumer and professional firearms channels, increased product shipments and higher average selling prices.
View source ↗ - Newsdefenseworld.net·50d ago·Neutral
Analyzing Smith & Wesson Brands (NASDAQ:SWBI) and JAKKS Pacific (NASDAQ:JAKK) JAKKS Pacific (NASDAQ: JAKK - Get Free Report) and Smith and Wesson Brands (NASDAQ: SWBI - Get Free Report) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk and valuation. Insider and Institutional Ownership
View source ↗
Earnings
Thu, Dec 3(in 8 weeks)
Consensus estimate $0.09 per share
Typical surprise +0.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Sep 3$0.06 vs $-0.06beat
- Wed, Jun 17$0.36 vs $0.23beat
- Thu, Mar 5$0.08 vs $0.04beat
- Thu, Dec 4$0.04 vs $0.05miss
- Thu, Sep 4$-0.08 vs $0.02miss
- Wed, Jun 18$0.20 vs $0.23miss
Estimates and results for SWBI via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by SWBI officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $462k
0 trades
9 trades
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Mcpherson Deana Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
- Scott Robert Lsold
91 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Congress trades
No disclosed congressional trades in SWBI.
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.