Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
135Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $4.09B | $477.10M | $3.09 |
| 2024 | $4.18B | $596.00M | $3.72 |
| 2023 | $4.77B | $982.80M | $6.17 |
| 2022 | $5.49B | $1.28B | $7.85 |
| 2021 | $5.11B | $1.50B | $9.07 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Tue, Oct 27(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $1.27 per share
Typical surprise +7.3% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Tue, Jul 28$1.08 vs $1.03beat
- Tue, May 5$1.15 vs $1.04beat
- Tue, Feb 3$1.54 vs $1.40beat
- Tue, Oct 28$1.76 vs $1.52beat
- Tue, Aug 5$1.33 vs $1.24beat
- Wed, May 7$1.24 vs $1.20beat
Estimates and results for SWKS via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by SWKS officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $765k
0 trades
4 trades
- Terry Robert Johnsold
- Terry Robert Johnsold
- Kasnavi Rezasold
- Kasnavi Rezasold
96 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from SWKS's reported EPS growth of -23.6% a year over 4 years. Historical EPS growth of -24% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $1.37
- Implied price
- $34.28
- Return from $69.62
- -13.2% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $17.04 — -75.5% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 17 | 21 | 25 | 29 | 33 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -29.1% | -26.0% | -23.4% | -21.1% | -19.1% |
| -20.0% | -24.4% | -21.1% | -18.3% | -15.9% | -13.7% |
| -15.0% | -19.7% | -16.2% | -13.2% | -10.6% | -8.3% |
| -10.0% | -14.9% | -11.3% | -8.1% | -5.3% | -2.9% |
| -5.0% | -10.2% | -6.3% | -3.0% | -0.1% | 2.5% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- News (Marketaux)acquirersmultiple.com·3h ago·Positive
Rich Pzena’s Latest Portfolio: Top 10 Holdings & Biggest Moves Portfolio Snapshot Total Portfolio Valu[+358 characters]
View source ↗