Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$1.67B-47.80%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Bracken Darrell
- Sector
- Consumer Cyclical
- Industry
- Apparel - Manufacturers
- Employees
- 26,000
- Beta
- 0.97
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 8 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 1.63
Financials
Revenue
$1.67B-47.8%Net Income
$-97.15M-120.9%EBITDA
$-18.69M-103.1%Free Cash Flow
$-115.76MEPS (diluted)
$-0.25-121.2%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
392.11M-0.5%Operating Expenses
$1.00BCash & Debt
$670.06MReturn of Capital
$40.47MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$8.46BDividend per Share
$0.09Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $9.61B | $254.92M | $0.65 |
| 2025 | $9.50B | $-189.72M | $-0.49 |
| 2024 | $9.92B | $-968.88M | $-2.49 |
| 2023 | $11.09B | $118.58M | $0.31 |
| 2022 | $11.84B | $1.39B | $3.55 |
| 2021 | $9.24B | $407.87M | $1.05 |
| 2020 | $10.49B | $679.45M | $1.72 |
| 2019 | $10.27B | $1.26B | $3.19 |
| 2018 | $11.49B | $658.55M | $0.64 |
| 2017 | $11.03B | $1.07B | $2.58 |
| 2016 | $11.00B | $1.23B | $2.90 |
| 2015 | $11.88B | $1.05B | $2.42 |
| 2014 | $11.42B | $1.21B | $2.76 |
| 2013 | $11.42B | $1.21B | $2.47 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from VFC's reported EPS growth of -9.8% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.39
- Implied price
- $9.74
- Return from $14.31
- -7.4% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $4.84 — -66.2% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 17 | 21 | 25 | 29 | 33 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -19.8% | -23.8% | -20.5% | -17.7% | -15.2% | -13.0% |
| -14.8% | -19.0% | -15.5% | -12.5% | -9.9% | -7.5% |
| -9.8% | -14.3% | -10.6% | -7.4% | -4.6% | -2.1% |
| -4.8% | -9.5% | -5.6% | -2.3% | 0.7% | 3.3% |
| 0.2% | -4.8% | -0.7% | 2.9% | 6.0% | 8.7% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
98Social Signal Score
Mentions (3)
- Newszacks.com·21h ago·Negative
VF Corp. Raises Fiscal 2027 Sales Outlook as Outdoor Growth Offsets Vans VFC raises its fiscal 2027 sales outlook as Outdoor and smaller brands offset Vans weakness, though a second-half recovery remains crucial.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·21h ago·Neutral
VFC Slides 14.2% in a Month as Vans Weakness Tests the Turnaround VF Corp.'s turnaround gains support from The North Face and Timberland, but Vans' declines remain the key test for recovery.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·21h ago·Positive
Is VFC Worth Buying as Cheap Valuation Meets Vans Execution Risk? VF Corp.'s discounted valuation and stronger Outdoor brands support its turnaround, but Vans weakness keeps execution risk high.
View source ↗
Earnings
Tue, Oct 27(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.51 per share
Typical surprise +27.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$-0.27 vs $-0.22miss
- Wed, May 20$-0.30 vs $-0.01miss
- Wed, Jan 28$0.58 vs $0.43beat
- Tue, Oct 28$0.52 vs $0.42beat
- Wed, Jul 30$-0.24 vs $-0.35beat
- Wed, May 21$-0.13 vs $-0.14beat
Estimates and results for VFC via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by VFC officers and directors.
- Bought
- $3.5m
- Sold
- $142k
6 trades
1 trade
- Carucci Richardbought
- Darrell Brackenbought
- Carucci Richardbought
- Chugg Juliana Lsold
- Carucci Richardbought
- Dalmia Abhishekbought
- Darrell Brackenbought
93 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.