Price
No data yet.
Signal Score (90d)
120Revenue
$1.73B+77.20%Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $5.83B | $251.38M | $0.55 |
| 2024 | $4.92B | $81.15M | $0.20 |
| 2023 | $4.50B | $-40.97M | $-0.10 |
| 2022 | $4.13B | $-47.45M | $-0.13 |
| 2021 | $3.83B | $49.01M | $0.13 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Wed, Oct 28(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.15 per share
Typical surprise -1.6% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$0.14 vs $0.14miss
- Mon, Apr 27$0.11 vs $0.12miss
- Thu, Feb 5$0.15 vs $0.10beat
- Wed, Oct 29$0.14 vs $0.09beat
- Wed, Jul 30$0.15 vs $0.85miss
- Wed, Apr 30$0.11 vs $0.82miss
Estimates and results for VTR via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by VTR officers and directors.
- Bought
- $197k
- Sold
- $4.8m
1 trade
4 trades
- Embler Michael Jbought
- Rakowich Walter Csold
- Roberts Carey S.sold
- Cafaro Debra Asold
- Cafaro Debra Asold
95 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from VTR's reported EPS growth of 43.4% a year over 4 years. Historical EPS growth of 43% reflects a recovery from a low base and won't persist. Capped at 30% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $2.05
- Implied price
- $36.92
- Return from $90.79
- -16.5% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $18.35 — -79.8% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.0% | -28.9% | -25.7% | -22.9% | -20.5% | -18.3% |
| 25.0% | -25.9% | -22.6% | -19.7% | -17.2% | -14.9% |
| 30.0% | -23.0% | -19.5% | -16.5% | -13.9% | -11.5% |
| 35.0% | -20.0% | -16.4% | -13.3% | -10.5% | -8.1% |
| 40.0% | -17.1% | -13.3% | -10.0% | -7.2% | -4.7% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newszacks.com·6h ago·Positive
Ventas (VTR) Could Be a Great Choice Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Ventas (VTR) have what it takes?
View source ↗