Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$87.68M+168.32%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Ramesh Srinivasan
- Sector
- Technology
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Employees
- 2,413
- Beta
- 0.37
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 8 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 16.19
Financials
Revenue
$87.68M+168.3%Net Income
$8.99MEBITDA
$13.13M+1637.3%Free Cash Flow
$7.31MEPS (diluted)
$0.32Shares Outstanding (diluted)
28.42M+25.7%Operating Expenses
$43.55MCash & Debt
$123.71MReturn of Capital
$419.0KRevenue by Segment (annual)
$113.37MDividend per Share
$0.03Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $319.31M | $38.79M | $1.39 |
| 2025 | $275.62M | $23.23M | $0.84 |
| 2024 | $237.46M | $86.19M | $3.31 |
| 2023 | $198.06M | $14.58M | $0.52 |
| 2022 | $162.64M | $6.48M | $0.19 |
| 2021 | $137.18M | $-21.00M | $-1.01 |
| 2020 | $160.76M | $-34.07M | $-1.47 |
| 2019 | $140.84M | $-13.16M | $-0.57 |
| 2018 | $127.36M | $-8.35M | $-0.37 |
| 2017 | $127.68M | $-11.72M | $-0.52 |
| 2016 | $120.37M | $-3.77M | $-0.17 |
| 2015 | $103.51M | $-11.50M | $-0.51 |
| 2014 | $101.26M | $17.10M | $0.77 |
| 2013 | $236.14M | $-1.30M | $-0.06 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $2.03
- Implied price
- $103.64
- Return from $112.49
- -1.6% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $51.53 — -54.2% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 35 | 43 | 51 | 59 | 67 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -17.2% | -13.7% | -10.7% | -8.1% | -5.7% |
| 3.0% | -13.0% | -9.3% | -6.2% | -3.4% | -0.9% |
| 8.0% | -8.8% | -4.9% | -1.6% | 1.3% | 3.9% |
| 13.0% | -4.5% | -0.5% | 2.9% | 6.0% | 8.7% |
| 18.0% | -0.3% | 3.9% | 7.5% | 10.7% | 13.5% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
120Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsdefenseworld.net·7h ago·Positive
Agilysys, Inc. (NASDAQ:AGYS) Receives Consensus Recommendation of “Moderate Buy” from Analysts Agilysys, Inc. (NASDAQ: AGYS - Get Free Report) has been given an average recommendation of "Moderate Buy" by the eight brokerages that are presently covering the stock, MarketBeat.com reports. Three investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold recommendation and five have assigned a buy recommendation to the company. The average 1-year price objective among
View source ↗
Earnings
Mon, Oct 26(in 8 weeks)
Consensus estimate $0.55 per share
Typical surprise +11.8% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Mon, Jul 27$0.49 vs $0.40beat
- Mon, May 18$0.63 vs $0.50beat
- Mon, Jan 26$0.42 vs $0.46miss
- Mon, Oct 27$0.40 vs $0.38beat
- Mon, Jul 21$0.33 vs $0.39miss
- Mon, May 19$0.54 vs $0.29beat
Estimates and results for AGYS via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by AGYS officers and directors.
- Bought
- $78k
- Sold
- $25.4m
16 trades
23 trades
- Wood William David Iiisold
- Badger Kyle Csold
- Srinivasan Rameshsold
- Srinivasan Rameshsold
- Srinivasan Rameshsold
- Srinivasan Rameshsold
- Badger Kyle Csold
- Badger Kyle Csold
61 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.