Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$95.42M+86.74%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Kenneth F. Bernstein
- Sector
- Real Estate
- Industry
- REIT - Retail
- Employees
- 138
- Beta
- 1.11
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.99
Financials
Revenue
$95.42M+86.7%Net Income
$11.04M+80.6%EBITDA
$78.29M+230.1%Free Cash Flow
$33.18M+141.6%EPS (diluted)
$0.05-37.5%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
133.82M+70.2%Operating Expenses
$11.78MCash & Debt
$32.96MReturn of Capital
$26.70MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$8.62MDividend per Share
$0.20Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $410.76M | $13.58M | $0.10 |
| 2024 | $359.69M | $21.65M | $0.19 |
| 2023 | $338.69M | $19.87M | $0.20 |
| 2022 | $326.29M | $-35.45M | $-0.38 |
| 2021 | $292.50M | $23.55M | $0.26 |
| 2020 | $250.91M | $-8.98M | $-0.11 |
| 2019 | $289.58M | $53.72M | $0.25 |
| 2018 | $262.21M | $31.44M | $0.38 |
| 2017 | $250.26M | $61.47M | $0.73 |
| 2016 | $189.94M | $72.78M | $0.94 |
| 2015 | $217.26M | $65.71M | $0.94 |
| 2014 | $195.01M | $71.06M | $1.18 |
| 2013 | $168.29M | $40.12M | $0.72 |
| 2012 | $134.43M | $39.71M | $0.85 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from AKR's reported EPS growth of -15.5% a year over 13 years. Historical EPS growth of -16% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.05
- Implied price
- $0.83
- Return from $20.29
- -47.3% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $0.41 — -98.0% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -57.1% | -55.1% | -53.5% | -52.0% | -50.7% |
| -20.0% | -54.2% | -52.1% | -50.4% | -48.8% | -47.4% |
| -15.0% | -51.4% | -49.2% | -47.3% | -45.6% | -44.1% |
| -10.0% | -48.5% | -46.2% | -44.2% | -42.4% | -40.9% |
| -5.0% | -45.6% | -43.2% | -41.1% | -39.2% | -37.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
107Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·5h ago·Neutral
Acadia Realty Trust: An Excellent Retail REIT, With More To Come Acadia Realty Trust earns a 'Buy' rating, driven by robust Q2 2026 results and strong portfolio performance. AKR delivered 10.7% AFFO growth, raised full-year guidance, and achieved 8.7% same-property NOI growth, led by premium street retail assets. Occupancy and leasing momentum remain strong, with embedded NOI upside and a well-laddered, mostly fixed-rate debt structure supporting financial flexibility.
View source ↗
Earnings
Tue, Oct 27(in 7 weeks)
Consensus estimate $0.07 per share
Typical surprise +261.5% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Tue, Jul 28$0.05 vs $0.05beat
- Tue, Apr 28$0.22 vs $0.04beat
- Tue, Feb 10$0.34 vs $0.09beat
- Tue, Oct 28$0.33 vs $0.08beat
- Tue, Jul 29$0.32 vs $0.09beat
- Tue, Apr 29$0.01 vs $0.07miss
Estimates and results for AKR via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by AKR officers and directors.
- Bought
- $16k
- Sold
- $5.1m
1 trade
10 trades
- Livingston Reginaldsold
- Livingston Reginaldsold
- Napolitano Josephsold
- Blacksberg Jasonsold
- Gottfried John J.sold
- Gottfried John J.sold
- Hartmann Richardsold
- Zoba C Davidbought
89 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.