Price
No data yet.
Signal Score (90d)
120Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $6.40B | $132.84M | $3.54 |
| 2024 | $6.72B | $376.35M | $9.63 |
| 2023 | $6.84B | $483.66M | $12.20 |
| 2022 | $8.39B | $857.66M | $21.70 |
| 2021 | $7.93B | $712.49M | $18.07 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Mon, Nov 2(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $1.11 per share
Typical surprise +0.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Mon, Aug 3$1.63 vs $1.23beat
- Mon, May 4$0.50 vs $0.43beat
- Mon, Feb 23$0.40 vs $0.16beat
- Mon, Nov 3$0.58 vs $0.58beat
- Mon, Aug 4$1.64 vs $1.69miss
- Mon, May 5$1.06 vs $1.36miss
Estimates and results for BCC via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by BCC officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $4.8m
0 trades
18 trades
- Matula Kristopher Jsold
- Twedt Jillsold
- Strom Jeffrey Robertsold
- Little Troysold
- Twedt Jillsold
- Twedt Jillsold
- Barney Joanna L.sold
- Strom Jeffrey Robertsold
82 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from BCC's reported EPS growth of -33.5% a year over 4 years. Historical EPS growth of -33% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $1.60
- Implied price
- $33.61
- Return from $81.39
- -16.2% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $16.71 — -79.5% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 27 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -30.9% | -28.3% | -26.1% | -24.1% | -22.3% |
| -20.0% | -26.3% | -23.5% | -21.1% | -19.0% | -17.1% |
| -15.0% | -21.7% | -18.8% | -16.2% | -13.9% | -11.9% |
| -10.0% | -17.1% | -14.0% | -11.3% | -8.9% | -6.7% |
| -5.0% | -12.4% | -9.2% | -6.4% | -3.8% | -1.5% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newszacks.com·5h ago·Positive
Here's Why Boise Cascade (BCC) is a Strong Value Stock Wondering how to pick strong, market-beating stocks for your investment portfolio? Look no further than the Zacks Style Scores.
View source ↗