Price
$122.41+7.74%Social Signal Score
Analyst Ratings
25 analysts52-week range
- Last close
- $122.41
- Off 52w high
- -6.8%
- 200-day average
- $114.78
- vs 200-day
- +6.6%
Revenue
$24.04B+110.46%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Gregory A. Heckman
- Sector
- Consumer Defensive
- Industry
- Agricultural Farm Products
- Employees
- 34,000
- Beta
- 0.66
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 3.17
Financials
Revenue
$24.04B+110.5%Net Income
$678.00M+474.6%EBITDA
$830.00M+112.3%Free Cash Flow
$-1.03B-192.9%EPS (diluted)
$3.46+316.9%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
196.00M+40.1%Operating Expenses
$606.00MCash & Debt
$593.00MReturn of Capital
$139.00MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$1.55BDividend per Share
$0.72Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $70.33B | $816.00M | $4.96 |
| 2024 | $53.11B | $1.14B | $8.09 |
| 2023 | $59.54B | $2.24B | $15.07 |
| 2022 | $67.23B | $1.61B | $10.74 |
| 2021 | $59.15B | $2.08B | $14.49 |
| 2020 | $41.40B | $1.15B | $8.02 |
| 2019 | $41.14B | $-1.28B | $-9.32 |
| 2018 | $45.74B | $267.00M | $1.65 |
| 2017 | $45.79B | $160.00M | $0.90 |
| 2016 | $42.68B | $745.00M | $5.07 |
| 2015 | $43.45B | $791.00M | $5.18 |
| 2014 | $57.16B | $515.00M | $4.19 |
| 2013 | $61.35B | $306.00M | $1.57 |
| 2012 | $60.99B | $64.00M | $0.19 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from BG's reported EPS growth of 28.5% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $17.32
- Implied price
- $311.80
- Return from $106.72
- 23.9% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $155.02 — today's price is already 31.2% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.5% | 5.4% | 10.2% | 14.3% | 17.9% | 21.0% |
| 23.5% | 9.8% | 14.8% | 19.1% | 22.8% | 26.1% |
| 28.5% | 14.3% | 19.5% | 23.9% | 27.8% | 31.3% |
| 33.5% | 18.7% | 24.1% | 28.7% | 32.8% | 36.4% |
| 38.5% | 23.2% | 28.8% | 33.6% | 37.7% | 41.5% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
50+0.00%Social Signal Score
Mentions (45)
- News (RSS)hellenicshipping·4d ago·Neutral
Bunge and ABP Reach One Million Metric Tonnes Milestone at Immingham Bunge and Associated British Ports (ABP) today announced that they have handled more than one million metric tonnes of grains and oilseeds through their agribulk storage and handling operations at the Port of Immingham since their partnership began in 2022. Through the combination of ABP’s port infrastructure and Bunge’s global sourcing, processing, merchandising and logistics ...
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·7d ago·Positive
>PG >WM >KMB >BG >HD they are buying the diapers and trash. they are buying toilet paper. they are buying the farm s***. the rotation is starting healthcare is green today too.
View source ↗ - News (RSS)seekingalpha·11d ago·Neutral
Bunge Global: A Mispricing Appears
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·12d ago·Negative
Bunge Global: A Mispricing Appears Bunge Global SA is a major player in the global agribusiness supply chain, specializing in oilseed and grain procurement, storage, and shipping. BG processes soybeans and softseeds into animal feed and oils for food and biofuels, occupying a critical position in the food value chain. The company is domiciled in Switzerland but maintains operational headquarters in Missouri, ensuring compliance with U.S. financial reporting standards.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·12d ago·Positive
…getting stuck in the top of meme stocks like you guys like to do. JPM is cheap probably buying more today. O is testing new lows ill probably buy some of it aswell. BG I'll buy more if it goes lower. I already shilled SCHD. DAL I realized gains on yesterday but I'll rebuy if it goes under 80 PCG seems like free money there are like 50 tickers I'm interested in right now and none of them are overpriced AI s***
View source ↗ - News247wallst.com·14d ago·Positive
Archer-Daniels Midland Vs. Bunge: These Two U.S. Agribusinesses Soar If the Trump-Xi Summit Yields Concessions A Trump-Xi summit could reshape global grain flows overnight, and two U.S. agribusiness giants are positioned very differently to capture the gains. Which one offers the better trade depends on whether you want torque or ballast.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·17d ago·Positive
Bunge Lifts 2026 EPS Outlook as Oilseed Momentum Offsets Grain Risks BG raises 2026 EPS guidance as stronger soybean and softseed processing offsets a lower Grain Merchandising and Milling outlook.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·17d ago·Positive
Is Bunge Worth Buying as Oilseed Strength Meets Integration Risks? BG's oilseed gains and Viterra synergies support growth, but weak cash conversion, grain volatility and valuation raise execution risks.
View source ↗ - News (RSS)seekingalpha·27d ago·Positive
Bunge Global SA (BG) Presents at Barclays 19th Annual Global Consumer Staples Conference Transcript
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·27d ago·Positive
Bunge Global SA (BG) Presents at Barclays 19th Annual Global Consumer Staples Conference Transcript Bunge Global SA (BG) Presents at Barclays 19th Annual Global Consumer Staples Conference Transcript
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Positive
>>62663415 Sorry, I should've been more careful with my language. THE OBSERVER gets to observe both children, not us. Suppose it's the father. We're just told "yes i have at least 1 son". He will answer this if he has BG GB or BB all the same. He doesn't get to answer twice because he has 2 sons. Nor would he somehow be less likely to answer yes just because he has a daughter. >>62663417 There is no result because you can't complete the experiment.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
>>62663362 Yes but we aren't doing that. The statement "at least 1 is a boy" means we get to observe BOTH children and answer affirmatively if either one is male. This means BB GB and BG houses all answer exactly the same. If we could only observe 1 child then yes, 50% of the time the GB and BG houses would fail and BB would be overrepresented.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
>>62663338 1/3 shouldn't be the answer without questioning the day of birth though because pulling any boy from BB GB and BG has a 50% chance it was pulled from BB
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Negative
>>62663283 That's going to drastically reduce the odds for the BG and GB combos, as having two boys gives you better odds of having one born on a Tuesday. >>62663288 You're not presenting the full pool of candidates if you're leaving out all children born second and on a Tuesday.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
…sible outcomes. Two of the outcomes include MM. If you eliminate one of the MM options, you also have to eliminate one of the GB outcomes. Because GB is the same as BG. Then it goes back to 50%. Because that's the answer. 50%.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
>>62663244 >The premise asks you to take all two-child families, and eliminate the GG combos from them. And you're left with: BB BG GB BB Half of the outcomes are BB.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
…an unknown, so you have to start from the beginning and eliminate based on variables. - Starting pool: all two-child families >which is 50% mixed sex (half of which BG and GB) and 50% same sex (half of which BB and GG) - Elimination round 1: remove all GG >this leaves BG, GB, and BB in three equal parts - Elimination round 2: remove all without at least one boy born on Tuesday >this removes a lot more BG and GB than BB since BB has better odds of having at least one B born on Tuesday See? Ea…
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
>>62663165 consider this: Out of all two-child families on earth, the distribution is: 50% two same sexes and 50% different sexes. These further subdivide as follows: BB: 25% GG: 25% BG: 25% GB: 25% Now take away the GG portion, and you're left with three equal portions. Giving 1/3. (and then there's Tuesday)
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
>>62656695 Let's look at it this way. If there are two kids, you have four outcomes: BB BG GB GG At least one is a boy just means the last outcome is impossible. Of the three outcomes, only one is BB. So 33%?
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
>>62661136 BG GB BB One third
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
>>62662931 Nah, Tuesday matters because there's 13 chances for a BB family to have a boy with a Tuesday birthday, 12 where one boy is Tuesday and the other is another day and 1 where both boys are born on Tuesday. There's 14 chances though for a BG or GB family where the boy is born on Tuesday though. To make it 50% you would have to say what's the chance the other child is a boy with a Tuesday birthday I think.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·30d ago·Neutral
If we ignored the "Tuesday" bit, the answer is 1/3. We have 4 equally likely outcomes GG GB BG BB The statement "at least one is a boy" eliminates the GG case. Of the remaining 3 cases only 1 has both boys. Simple. Now let's consider Tuesday. I'm going to call the person relaying the fact "at least one is a boy born on Tuesday" as "the observer". Suppose the observer only cares whether Mr. Smith has a male heir or not. He shows up to a dinner party and meets his children. He then inquires on…
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·31d ago·Neutral
>>62656695 isn't this too simple? BB BG GG GB at least one is a boy so GG vanishes as a probability so it is 1/3 33.3% so this earns me 650k? kek
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·31d ago·Neutral
>>62662051 Nah BG and GB are both valid outcomes since the question doesn't explicitly exclude either of those pairings. So you have BB, BG, and GB, of which there's a 2/4 chance the boy observed comes from the BB family and a 1/4+1/4 chance he comes from a BG or GB family. I guess to make this like betrands box you would have to say something explicitly like "there are three family's, a GB, GG, and BB family." That would increase the chance to 66%.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·31d ago·Neutral
>>62662059 >>bg = gb To be fair; there are twice as many "mixed sex" pairings in real-world statistics. Out of all two-child families on earth, the distribution is: BB: 25% GG: 25% BG: 25% GB: 25% I may have to revise my answer. HOWEVER, there is the Tuesday, and if both are boys the odds of one of them being born on a Tuesday are much greater than if there were only one boy. You know what, I'm sticking with 50/50 because f*** you that's why.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·31d ago·Neutral
>>62660998 >>62660018 There are only two possibilities: BG or BB. Now flip a coin.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·31d ago·Neutral
>>62660018 I looked it up and I'm wrong because there's 4 choices s***. BB BG GB GG
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·31d ago·Neutral
>>62656810 >>62656827 You're wrong. There are 4 equally likely outcomes: GG GB BG BB The statement "at least 1 is a boy" eliminates the GG case. Of the remaining outcomes 1 is BB so the answer is 1/3. You start branching into sub-worlds without first ensuring your cases are mutually exclusive. The case "child 1 is male" or "child 2 is male" have overlap and causes you to double-count the BB case later on. You could make these cases mutually exclusive with some re-framing. We observe child 1,…
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·32d ago·Neutral
"At least one is a boy" Universe is: BG GB BB Prob both are boys is 1 in 3
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·32d ago·Negative
>>62657270 I was wrong to dismiss the day of the week on >>62656888 it does change the scenario, so basically this increases our outcomes. Take all combinations of BG possible with all the days of the week so we have 4 sets of 49 possibilities. Set 1 is G(Mon-Sun)G(Mon-Sun) Set 2 is G(Mon-Sun)B(Mon-Sun) Set 3 is B(Mon-Sun)B(Mon-Sun) Set 4 is B(Mon-Sun)G(Mon-Sun) In set 1 there are 0 pairs with a Boy born on Tuesday In set 2 there are 7 pairs with a Boy born on tuesday In set 3 there are 13 pai…
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·32d ago·Neutral
>>62656888 BG=GB GG is precluded based on the question. It's 50%. >BG = GB >BB
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·32d ago·Neutral
>>62656853 Outcomes: BB BG GB GG Let A = both kids are boys (1/4=>0.25) Let B = at least one of the 2 kids is a boy (3/4 =>0.75) P(A|B) = P(AnB)/P(B)= 0.25/0.75 = 0.333 ~33.3%
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·32d ago·Neutral
>>62656818 The order does not matter. BG and GB are identical sets based on the question's constraints. 50% is correct.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·32d ago·Neutral
>>62656695 BB (50%) BG (50%) 50%
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·32d ago·Neutral
>>62655776 BG is still too expensive I hope bussy tanks it back to 110 and then I'll buy it again
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·35d ago·Negative
Is BUNGE GLOBAL SA (BG) Stock Outpacing Its Basic Materials Peers This Year? Here is how Bunge Global (BG) and Carpenter Technology (CRS) have performed compared to their sector so far this year.
View source ↗ - News (RSS)zerohedge·37d ago·Neutral
Barclays Warns Next Commodity Shock Is Taking Shape: What You Need To Know Barclays Warns Next Commodity Shock Is Taking Shape: What You Need To Know Wall Street coverage of a record-breaking Super El Niño is only growing as agricultural commodities break out. Yet the rally extends well beyond the agricultural complex, with industrial metals and other critical materials showing signs of tightness in physical markets. Whether it is veteran commodities strategist Jeff Currie turning bullish or UBS
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·38d ago·Positive
Why Bunge Is A Buy On The Pullback Due To Global Agriculture Demand (Upgrade) Bunge Global SA is upgraded to Buy, driven by global agricultural demand and sector dominance. BG benefits from rising energy and agricultural prices, recent earnings beats, and strong sector positioning among the ABCD companies. Despite historical volatility, BG's long-term uptrend and compelling macro tailwinds support further upside and opportunistic buying on corrections.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·38d ago·Positive
2 Agriculture - Products Stocks to Buy in a Promising Industry The Agriculture - Products industry is set to gain from solid demand. Stocks like BG and GRWG are poised to ride on this positive trend.
View source ↗ - News (RSS)zerohedge·41d ago·Neutral
…easury Secretary Scott Bessent’s threat to unleash an economic assault against Iran risks setting the US on a collision course with China, its main trading partner: BBG Iran vows to resist widened US sanctions, says Washington seeks talks: RTRS U.S. Squeezes Iran but Avoids Targeting Its Biggest Lifeline: China: WSJ Stanley Druckenmiller, the billionaire investor who mentored US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in his early career as a hedge fund trader, suggested his former pupil is making a mi…
View source ↗ - Newsbusinesswire.com·46d ago·Neutral
Bunge to Present at Barclays Annual Global Consumer Conference ST. LOUIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $BG #Investors--Bunge to Present at Barclays Annual Global Consumer Conference.
View source ↗ - News (RSS)investing·49d ago·Neutral
Bunge prices $600 million senior notes offering due 2031
View source ↗ - Newsbusinesswire.com·49d ago·Neutral
Bunge Global SA Announces Pricing of $600 Million Senior Notes Offering ST. LOUIS--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- #Investors--Bunge Global SA Announces Pricing of $600 Million Senior Notes Offering.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·55d ago·Neutral
Bought BG. This better be good.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·56d ago·Neutral
BG chads RISE
View source ↗
Earnings
Thu, Oct 29(in 3 weeks)
Consensus estimate $2.47 per share
Typical surprise +17.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$2.00 vs $1.97beat
- Wed, Apr 29$1.83 vs $0.88beat
- Wed, Feb 4$1.99 vs $1.81beat
- Wed, Nov 5$2.27 vs $1.94beat
- Wed, Jul 30$1.31 vs $1.09beat
- Wed, May 7$1.81 vs $1.28beat
Estimates and results for BG via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by BG officers and directors.
- Bought
- $689k
- Sold
- $337k
2 trades
1 trade
- Mahoney Christopherbought
- Mahoney Christopherbought
- Garros Juliosold
97 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Congress trades
- Alan Armstrongsenate · disclosed Jul 21, 2026 (116d later)Buy$1,001 - $15,000
- Ro Khannahouse · CA17 · disclosed Feb 10, 2026 (12d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
- Ro Khannahouse · CA17 · disclosed Dec 6, 2024 (21d later)Buy$1,001 - $15,000
- Ro Khannahouse · CA17 · disclosed Mar 6, 2024 (22d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
- Ro Khannahouse · CA17 · disclosed Jun 12, 2023 (20d later)Buy$1,001 - $15,000
- Earl Blumenauerhouse · OR03 · disclosed Apr 16, 2020 (28d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
- Earl Blumenauerhouse · OR03 · disclosed Nov 6, 2018 (4d later)Buy$1,001 - $15,000
- Josh S. Gottheimerhouse · NJ05 · disclosed Aug 13, 2018 (487d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.