Price
$10.83-0.09%Social Signal Score
Revenue
$7.82M-42.07%Company Profile
- CEO
- Daniel H. Smith
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Asset Management
- Beta
- 0.42
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.59
Financials
Revenue
$7.82M-42.1%Net Income
$-3.27MEBITDA
$-1.45MFree Cash Flow
$4.44M-48.2%EPS (diluted)
$-0.26Shares Outstanding (diluted)
12.71M+0.0%Operating Expenses
$0.00Cash & Debt
$2.25MReturn of Capital
$6.05MDividend per Share
$0.08Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $18.39M | $9.01M | $0.71 |
| 2024 | $17.64M | $16.31M | $1.28 |
| 2023 | $17.36M | $24.43M | $1.92 |
| 2022 | $4.03M | $-22.60M | $-1.74 |
| 2021 | $18.30M | $16.56M | $1.30 |
| 2020 | $6.75M | $5.06M | $0.39 |
| 2019 | $21.74M | $20.10M | $1.58 |
| 2018 | $3.66M | $1.82M | $0.14 |
| 2017 | $19.40M | $17.53M | $1.39 |
| 2016 | $10.76M | $38.25M | $3.01 |
| 2015 | $18.14M | $-14.93M | $-1.18 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $1.04
- Implied price
- $16.67
- Return from $10.52
- 9.6% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $8.29 — -21.2% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -6.1% | -3.1% | -0.5% | 1.9% | 4.0% |
| 3.0% | -1.3% | 1.8% | 4.6% | 7.1% | 9.3% |
| 8.0% | 3.5% | 6.7% | 9.6% | 12.3% | 14.6% |
| 13.0% | 8.3% | 11.7% | 14.7% | 17.4% | 19.9% |
| 18.0% | 13.1% | 16.6% | 19.8% | 22.6% | 25.3% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
88-26.67%Social Signal Score
Mentions (3)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·37d ago·Negative
Income-Covered Closed-End Fund Report, August 2026 Quantitative screens highlight CEFs trading at wide discounts, negative z-scores, and high yields, offering both value and income potential. Metrics like premium/discount, coverage, leverage, and z-score are used to shortlist funds for further due diligence, not as final buy/sell recommendations. Funds such as BGX, PFO, and EFT consistently rank highly across discount, yield, and coverage screens, warranting closer investor attention.
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·55d ago·Negative
BGX: Don't Bet On Distribution Hikes In The Near Term The Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund targets high current income via leveraged exposure to floating-rate senior loans and CLOs, yielding 9.09%. BGX's income and distribution sustainability hinge on interest rate direction; recent weak jobs data and political bias suggest rate hikes may be unlikely. Despite full net investment income coverage of distributions in 2025, BGX suffered capital losses and a 10.72% share price decline since M
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·59d ago·Positive
Triple-Factor Closed-End Fund Report, July 2026 The Triple-Factor CEF screen identifies funds with yields >6.5%, coverage >90%, and discounts to NAV, balancing income, sustainability, and value. Top candidates like BGX, DHF, and VVR offer deep discounts, strong coverage, and substantial yields, presenting both income and capital appreciation potential. Negative z-scores highlight CEFs trading well below historical valuation ranges, suggesting tactical buying opportunities for income-focused inve
View source ↗
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by BGX officers and directors.
- Bought
- $314k
- Sold
- $21k
19 trades
2 trades
- Mckemie Gordonsold
- Naratil Valeriebought
- Naratil Valeriebought
- Mckemie Gordonsold
- Lee Janebought
- Mckemie Gordonbought
- Mckemie Gordonbought
- Shaiman Lee Michaelbought
51 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Congress trades
No disclosed congressional trades in BGX.
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.