Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
118Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.96B | $5.38M | $0.06 |
| 2024 | $3.95B | $-128.02M | $-1.49 |
| 2023 | $4.17B | $247.39M | $2.84 |
| 2022 | $4.01B | $101.91M | $1.15 |
| 2021 | $4.12B | $215.56M | $2.42 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Thu, Nov 5(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $-0.20 per share
Typical surprise +17.5% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Aug 5$0.39 vs $0.29beat
- Wed, May 6$0.67 vs $0.57beat
- Wed, Feb 25$0.26 vs $0.25beat
- Thu, Nov 6$-0.03 vs $-0.12beat
- Wed, Aug 6$0.33 vs $0.28beat
- Wed, May 7$0.59 vs $0.57beat
Estimates and results for BLMN via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from BLMN's reported EPS growth of -59.8% a year over 4 years. Historical EPS growth of -60% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.03
- Implied price
- $0.50
- Return from $10.55
- -45.6% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $0.25 — -97.6% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -55.7% | -53.7% | -52.0% | -50.5% | -49.1% |
| -20.0% | -52.8% | -50.6% | -48.8% | -47.2% | -45.7% |
| -15.0% | -49.8% | -47.5% | -45.6% | -43.9% | -42.3% |
| -10.0% | -46.9% | -44.4% | -42.4% | -40.6% | -38.9% |
| -5.0% | -43.9% | -41.3% | -39.2% | -37.3% | -35.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (3)
- Newszacks.com·5d ago·Positive
Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) Upgraded to Strong Buy: Here's Why Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) has been upgraded to a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), reflecting growing optimism about the company's earnings prospects. This might drive the stock higher in the near term.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·5d ago·Neutral
BLMN vs. SHAK: Which Stock Is the Better Value Option? Investors interested in Retail - Restaurants stocks are likely familiar with Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) and Shake Shack (SHAK). But which of these two stocks offers value investors a better bang for their buck right now?
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·5d ago·Positive
Bloomin' Brands: I Called The Turnaround Too Early, The Market Didn't Bloomin' Brands, Inc. is upgraded to Hold after a post-earnings rally, reflecting a more balanced risk/reward profile. Outback's same-store sales growth is driven entirely by pricing, while traffic continues to decline, raising sustainability concerns. Bonefish Grill and Fleming's outperform with traffic-driven growth and value-focused menu innovations, partially offsetting Outback's challenges.
View source ↗