Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$89.13M+949.36%Company Profile
- CEO
- John Perlowski
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Asset Management
- Beta
- 0.76
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 5 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 536.80
Financials
Revenue
$89.13M+949.4%Net Income
$32.78MEBITDA
$32.78MFree Cash Flow
$-6.18M-221.3%EPS (diluted)
$1.36Shares Outstanding (diluted)
24.06M+41.9%Operating Expenses
$0.00Cash & Debt
$17.50MReturn of Capital
$40.91MDividend per Share
$0.15Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $111.59M | $103.51M | $4.58 |
| 2024 | $37.27M | $35.62M | $1.59 |
| 2023 | $32.36M | $36.08M | $1.61 |
| 2022 | $-43.45M | $-44.53M | $-2.00 |
| 2021 | $119.89M | $120.10M | $3.19 |
| 2020 | $15.14M | $58.29M | $3.23 |
| 2019 | $80.86M | $79.93M | $4.59 |
| 2018 | $-14.30M | $-15.15M | $-0.90 |
| 2017 | $54.31M | $53.34M | $3.15 |
| 2016 | $22.48M | $23.10M | $1.37 |
| 2015 | $18.96M | $-25.53M | $-1.51 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $6.73
- Implied price
- $40.38
- Return from $26.50
- 8.8% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $20.07 — -24.2% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -20.8% | -9.0% | -1.3% | 4.6% | 9.3% |
| 3.0% | -16.7% | -4.3% | 3.8% | 9.9% | 14.9% |
| 8.0% | -12.7% | 0.3% | 8.8% | 15.2% | 20.5% |
| 13.0% | -8.6% | 5.0% | 13.8% | 20.6% | 26.1% |
| 18.0% | -4.6% | 9.6% | 18.9% | 25.9% | 31.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
106Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·1d ago·Positive
BUI: A 6.9% Yield At NAV After Abandoning Covered Calls BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust is rated a Buy at current prices due to improved strategy and valuation. BUI eliminated its covered-call option strategy, leading to a 17.2% NAV return in H1 2026, outperforming its benchmark. The fund raised its monthly distribution by 13.2% to $0.154/share (6.9% yield), now trading around NAV after a rights offering.
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·1d ago·Neutral
BUI: An Income Investor's Way To Play The AI Bottlenecks Game BlackRock Utilities Infrastructure & Power Oppty offers a 6.9% yield, targeting income investors seeking exposure to infrastructure, utilities, and power equities. BUI stands out as a closed-end fund alternative amid capital-intensive AI supply chain investments, where direct participants reinvest heavily for growth. With $720 million AUM and a 1.10% expense ratio, BUI leverages debt to enhance returns, distinguishing it from typical …
View source ↗
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by BUI officers and directors.
- Bought
- $940
- Sold
- —
1 trade
0 trades
- Harris Stayce D.bought
99 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.