Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$60.41M-2.16%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Jon Scott Stenberg
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Insurance - Life
- Employees
- 245
- Beta
- 0.46
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 5 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.27
Financials
Revenue
$60.41M-2.2%Net Income
$-425.0K-115.4%EBITDA
$-349.0K-106.4%Free Cash Flow
$2.01M-92.2%EPS (diluted)
$-0.01-113.8%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
50.98M+1.8%Operating Expenses
$14.09MCash & Debt
$31.87MReturn of Capital
$0.00Revenue by Segment (annual)
$56.90MQuote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $255.62M | $14.59M | $0.29 |
| 2024 | $245.00M | $14.91M | $0.29 |
| 2023 | $240.68M | $24.44M | $0.49 |
| 2022 | $232.52M | $26.01M | $0.52 |
| 2021 | $250.53M | $72.71M | $1.46 |
| 2020 | $238.85M | $-10.99M | $-0.22 |
| 2019 | $250.59M | $-1.37M | $-0.03 |
| 2018 | $244.01M | $-11.06M | $-0.22 |
| 2017 | $252.63M | $-38.13M | $-0.77 |
| 2016 | $245.41M | $1.97M | $0.04 |
| 2015 | $236.27M | $-3.14M | $-0.07 |
| 2014 | $230.22M | $-5.97M | $-0.13 |
| 2013 | $213.64M | $4.79M | $0.10 |
| 2012 | $202.76M | $4.53M | $0.09 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from CIA's reported EPS growth of 9.4% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.46
- Implied price
- $7.76
- Return from $3.92
- 14.6% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $3.86 — -1.6% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 11 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.6% | -4.5% | 0.2% | 4.1% | 7.6% | 10.6% |
| 4.4% | 0.3% | 5.2% | 9.4% | 13.0% | 16.2% |
| 9.4% | 5.1% | 10.3% | 14.6% | 18.4% | 21.8% |
| 14.4% | 9.9% | 15.3% | 19.9% | 23.8% | 27.3% |
| 19.4% | 14.7% | 20.3% | 25.1% | 29.2% | 32.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
105Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newsmarketbeat.com·1d ago·Neutral
Champion Iron Gets Second Strike on Pay Report as Shareholders Back Board Champion Iron TSE: CIA shareholders adopted the company's 2026 remuneration report at its annual general meeting, but opposition exceeding 25% of votes cast resulted in a second strike under Australia's Corporations Act.
View source ↗ - Newscnbc.com·1d ago·Positive
CIA chief John Ratcliffe reportedly made secretive Moscow trip to warn Russia against attacking NATO CIA Director John Ratcliffe reportedly traveled to Moscow to warn Russia against attacking NATO. Russia and Ukraine have intensified long-range drone and missile strikes as fears of further escalation grow.
View source ↗
Earnings
Thu, Nov 5(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.03 per share
Typical surprise -30.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Aug 6$0.01 vs $0.07miss
- Thu, May 7$0.03 vs $0.05miss
- Thu, Mar 12$0.11 vs $0.08beat
- Thu, Nov 6$0.07 vs $0.06beat
- Thu, Aug 7$0.13 vs $0.04beat
- Thu, May 8$0.02 vs $0.05miss
Estimates and results for CIA via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by CIA officers and directors.
- Bought
- $313k
- Sold
- —
5 trades
0 trades
- Hoxworth Seth Alanbought
- Stenberg Jonbought
- Stenberg Jonbought
- Stenberg Jonbought
- Davis Cynthia Hbought
95 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.