Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$87.80M+10.12%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Jeffrey H. Fisher
- Sector
- Real Estate
- Industry
- REIT - Hotel & Motel
- Employees
- 16
- Beta
- 1.10
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 7 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.79
Financials
Revenue
$87.80M+10.1%Net Income
$8.21M-38.3%EBITDA
$30.68M-2.5%Free Cash Flow
$12.21M-51.0%EPS (diluted)
$0.13-62.9%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
50.00M+29.6%Operating Expenses
$14.19MCash & Debt
$11.34MReturn of Capital
$9.80MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$294.00MDividend per Share
$0.10Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $295.07M | $15.05M | $0.14 |
| 2024 | $317.21M | $4.17M | $-0.08 |
| 2023 | $311.11M | $2.64M | $-0.11 |
| 2022 | $294.85M | $9.80M | $0.04 |
| 2021 | $203.97M | $-18.41M | $-0.85 |
| 2020 | $132.45M | $-76.02M | $-1.97 |
| 2019 | $328.33M | $18.70M | $0.39 |
| 2018 | $324.23M | $30.64M | $0.67 |
| 2017 | $298.86M | $29.48M | $0.73 |
| 2016 | $293.82M | $31.48M | $0.82 |
| 2015 | $276.95M | $32.97M | $0.87 |
| 2014 | $197.22M | $66.87M | $2.32 |
| 2013 | $126.23M | $2.98M | $0.13 |
| 2012 | $100.46M | $-1.45M | $-0.10 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.45
- Implied price
- $22.21
- Return from $13.79
- 10.0% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $11.04 — -19.9% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 35 | 42 | 49 | 56 | 63 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -6.7% | -3.2% | -0.2% | 2.5% | 5.0% |
| 3.0% | -1.9% | 1.7% | 4.9% | 7.7% | 10.3% |
| 8.0% | 2.8% | 6.7% | 10.0% | 13.0% | 15.7% |
| 13.0% | 7.6% | 11.6% | 15.1% | 18.2% | 21.0% |
| 18.0% | 12.4% | 16.5% | 20.2% | 23.4% | 26.4% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
114Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·5h ago·Positive
Chatham Lodging Trust: Narrower Discount, Still A Buy Chatham Lodging Trust has delivered a 73% share price increase and 76% total return since March, outperforming hotel REIT peers. CLDT raised guidance for AFFO to $1.28–$1.34/share, reflecting strong Q2 results; margin expansion; and record RevPAR, especially in Silicon Valley properties. The valuation gap has narrowed: CLDT now trades at 10.35x AFFO and 0.88x P/B, still below peers but less discounted than before.
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Nov 4(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.05 per share
Typical surprise +18.2% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Tue, Aug 4$0.13 vs $0.11beat
- Thu, May 7$-0.09 vs $0.16miss
- Wed, Feb 25$0.05 vs $-0.12beat
- Wed, Nov 5$0.03 vs $0.01beat
- Wed, Aug 6$0.07 vs $0.34miss
- Tue, May 6$-0.01 vs $0.13miss
Estimates and results for CLDT via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by CLDT officers and directors.
- Bought
- $2.7m
- Sold
- $34k
17 trades
2 trades
- Craven Dennis Mbought
- Williams Ethel Isaacssold
- Brewer Edwin B Jrbought
- Craven Dennis Mbought
- Fisher Jeffrey Hbought
- Craven Dennis Mbought
- Perlmutter Robert Dbought
- Brewer Edwin B Jrbought
81 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.