Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$351.70M+763.81%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Jay Allison
- Sector
- Energy
- Industry
- Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
- Employees
- 252
- Beta
- 0.10
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 1.38
Financials
Revenue
$351.70M+763.8%Net Income
$8.77M+80.7%EBITDA
$234.64M+235.9%Free Cash Flow
$-261.72MEPS (diluted)
$0.03-92.7%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
291.46M+2422.0%Operating Expenses
$17.15MCash & Debt
$45.01MReturn of Capital
$0.00Revenue by Segment (annual)
$2.86BDividend per Share
$0.13Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.93B | $420.20M | $1.36 |
| 2024 | $1.25B | $-218.75M | $-0.76 |
| 2023 | $1.57B | $211.89M | $0.76 |
| 2022 | $3.63B | $1.14B | $4.75 |
| 2021 | $1.85B | $-241.72M | $-1.12 |
| 2020 | $858.20M | $-52.42M | $-0.39 |
| 2019 | $768.69M | $96.89M | $0.52 |
| 2018 | $255.33M | $-111.41M | $-0.27 |
| 2017 | $255.33M | $-111.41M | $-7.61 |
| 2016 | $175.71M | $-135.13M | $-11.52 |
| 2015 | $252.42M | $-1.05B | $-113.54 |
| 2014 | $555.23M | $-57.11M | $-6.13 |
| 2013 | $420.29M | $41.03M | $4.25 |
| 2012 | $456.19M | $-100.06M | $-10.78 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $2.12
- Implied price
- $36.10
- Return from $14.17
- 20.6% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $17.95 — today's price is already 21.0% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 11 | 14 | 17 | 20 | 23 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | 0.3% | 5.2% | 9.4% | 13.0% | 16.2% |
| 3.0% | 5.4% | 10.6% | 15.0% | 18.8% | 22.1% |
| 8.0% | 10.5% | 16.0% | 20.6% | 24.5% | 28.1% |
| 13.0% | 15.6% | 21.3% | 26.1% | 30.3% | 34.0% |
| 18.0% | 20.7% | 26.7% | 31.7% | 36.1% | 39.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
107Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newszacks.com·5h ago·Neutral
Is CRK Stock Worth Buying Despite Heavy Spending and Weak Estimates? Comstock's improving production and deep inventory offer upside, but heavy spending, leverage and weaker estimates keep the near-term case in check.
View source ↗
Earnings
Mon, Nov 2(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.06 per share
Typical surprise +45.5% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$0.03 vs $0.02beat
- Tue, May 5$0.15 vs $0.23miss
- Wed, Feb 11$0.16 vs $0.11beat
- Mon, Nov 3$0.09 vs $0.04beat
- Wed, Jul 30$0.13 vs $0.09beat
- Wed, Apr 30$0.18 vs $0.16beat
Estimates and results for CRK via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by CRK officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $1.0m
0 trades
1 trade
- Mcgough Patricksold
99 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.