Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$94.75M+84.24%Company Profile
- Sector
- Technology
- Industry
- Software - Application
- Beta
- 7.38
Financials
Revenue
$94.75M+84.2%Net Income
$7.78MEBITDA
$8.85MFree Cash Flow
$22.38M+67.2%EPS (diluted)
$0.14Shares Outstanding (diluted)
54.99M+80.7%Operating Expenses
$67.97MCash & Debt
$177.74MReturn of Capital
$0.00Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | $352.65M | $10.23M | $0.20 |
| 2015 | $320.16M | $-4.42M | $-0.08 |
| 2014 | $277.45M | $-67.50M | $-1.30 |
| 2013 | $233.79M | $-3.63M | $-0.10 |
| 2012 | $198.93M | $-7.39M | $-0.16 |
| 2011 | $160.92M | $605.0K | $0.01 |
| 2010 | $142.13M | $2.96M | $0.09 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from CUDA's reported EPS growth of 14.8% a year over 6 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.39
- Implied price
- $7.00
- Return from $0.02
- 222.7% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $3.48 — today's price is already 99.4% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.8% | 171.7% | 184.1% | 194.6% | 203.8% | 212.1% |
| 9.8% | 184.6% | 197.6% | 208.7% | 218.3% | 227.0% |
| 14.8% | 197.6% | 211.2% | 222.7% | 232.8% | 241.9% |
| 19.8% | 210.6% | 224.7% | 236.8% | 247.3% | 256.7% |
| 24.8% | 223.5% | 238.3% | 250.9% | 261.8% | 271.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
90Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsyoutube.com·5h ago·Negative
CUDA isn't Nvidia's moat anymore. Its balance sheet is. Nvidia's moat isn't CUDA anymore Nvidia reports tomorrow, and analyst Patrick Moorhead argues the thing protecting it is no longer the thing everyone cites. CUDA is still a moat, he says, just a smaller one.
View source ↗
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by CUDA officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $2.5m
0 trades
5 trades
- Hughes Michael Dsold
- Driggs Dustinsold
- Driggs Dustinsold
- Driggs Dustinsold
- Perone Michael Dsold
95 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.