Price (90d)
$26.14Signal Score (90d)
87Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $6.05B | $3.71M | $-0.01 |
| 2024 | $4.77B | $-507.29M | $-1.05 |
| 2023 | $3.67B | $-802.14M | $-1.73 |
| 2022 | $2.24B | $-1.38B | $-3.15 |
| 2021 | $1.30B | $-1.52B | $-3.79 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Thu, Nov 5(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $-0.34 per share
Typical surprise +0.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Aug 6$-0.14 vs $0.02miss
- Thu, May 7$0.20 vs $0.22miss
- Thu, Feb 12$0.36 vs $0.36beat
- Thu, Nov 6$-0.26 vs $-0.43beat
- Thu, Aug 7$0.38 vs $0.15beat
- Thu, May 8$-0.07 vs $-0.08beat
Estimates and results for DKNG via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.01
- Implied price
- $0.26
- Return from $26.14
- -60.1% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $0.13 — -99.5% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -66.6% | -65.1% | -63.8% | -62.7% | -61.6% |
| 3.0% | -64.9% | -63.3% | -61.9% | -60.8% | -59.7% |
| 8.0% | -63.2% | -61.5% | -60.1% | -58.8% | -57.7% |
| 13.0% | -61.5% | -59.7% | -58.2% | -56.9% | -55.8% |
| 18.0% | -59.8% | -58.0% | -56.4% | -55.0% | -53.8% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (8)
- Newsfool.com·2d ago·Neutral
As Prediction Markets Proliferate, Is DraftKings Stock a Buy or Sell? The proliferation of prediction markets is increasing competition.
View source ↗ - Newspymnts.com·2d ago·Negative
DraftKings Shows Rewards in Dollars to Simplify Redemption DraftKings has rolled out a new rewards currency called Crown Cash that powers the company's loyalty program, DraftKings Rewards, and makes it easier to view and use rewards across eligible DraftKings experiences, the digital sports and gaming company said in a Wednesday (Aug. 12) press release.
View source ↗ - News (RSS)ft·4d ago·Negative
FanDuel and DraftKings hedge their bets with a predictions pivot Branching into predictions has charms for sportsbook operators that aren’t just defensive
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·5d ago·Negative
DraftKings: Despite Prediction Markets, This Company Is Facing Revenue Declines DraftKings faces existential pressure as prediction markets outpace traditional sportsbook offerings. DKNG remains a "Sell" despite a brief Q2 rebound; shares are down ~30% YTD and trade at a premium. Revenue and EBITDA are declining, with 1H EBITDA at $282 million, well below the FY26 guidance midpoint of $750 million.
View source ↗ - News247wallst.com·5d ago·Neutral
DraftKings After Earnings: Buy, Hold, or Run? At $24.03, DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG | DKNG Price Prediction) is a hold.
View source ↗ - News (RSS)cnbc·7d ago·Negative
Prediction markets take center stage in latest round of quarterly earnings reports Recent quarterly reports from DraftKings, Flutter Entertainment and others offer a view into prediction markets businesses and their performance.
View source ↗ - Newsfool.com·7d ago·Negative
Stock Market Today, Aug. 7: DraftKings Surges 8% on Prediction-Market Growth After Q2 Results Today, Aug. 7, 2026, the sportsbook platform reported record $13.1 billion in combined volume despite customer-friendly outcomes pressuring margins.
View source ↗ - 4chan /biz/biz·8d ago·Neutral
DKNG yay or nay?
View source ↗