Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Analyst Ratings
3 analystsRevenue
$1.04B+5.69%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Gianluca Palumbo
- Sector
- Utilities
- Industry
- Regulated Electric
- Employees
- 1,792
- Beta
- 0.44
- Country
- CL
- Piotroski score
- 7 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 499.25
Financials
Revenue
$1.04B+5.7%Net Income
$109.56M-47.6%EBITDA
$312.19M-33.9%Free Cash Flow
$176.10MEPS (diluted)
$0.08-99.9%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
1.38B+41.0%Operating Expenses
$42.40MCash & Debt
$276.94MReturn of Capital
$238.47MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$46.83BDividend per Share
$0.15Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $4.50B | $536.78M | $0.39 |
| 2024 | $4.14B | $153.71M | $105.00 |
| 2023 | $5.07B | $753.96M | $0.55 |
| 2022 | $5.01B | $1.43B | $1.06 |
| 2021 | $3.72B | $111.93M | $0.07 |
| 2020 | $3.22B | $-64.25M | $-37.00 |
| 2019 | $3.73B | $421.02M | $214.00 |
| 2018 | $3.75B | $563.37M | $283.00 |
| 2017 | $3.83B | $538.41M | $356.00 |
| 2016 | $3.12B | $469.60M | $391.50 |
| 2015 | $3.64B | $384.52M | $256.50 |
| 2014 | $3.53B | $284.64M | $165.50 |
| 2013 | $3.47B | $463.28M | $234.00 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from ENIC's reported EPS growth of -41.3% a year over 12 years. Historical EPS growth of -41% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.17
- Implied price
- $1.72
- Return from $4.42
- -17.2% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $0.86 — -80.6% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -34.0% | -30.1% | -26.9% | -24.2% | -21.8% |
| -20.0% | -29.6% | -25.5% | -22.1% | -19.2% | -16.6% |
| -15.0% | -25.2% | -20.8% | -17.2% | -14.1% | -11.4% |
| -10.0% | -20.8% | -16.1% | -12.3% | -9.1% | -6.2% |
| -5.0% | -16.4% | -11.5% | -7.4% | -4.0% | -1.0% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
130+62.50%Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newszacks.com·7h ago·Positive
3 Reasons Why Growth Investors Shouldn't Overlook Enel Chile (ENIC) Enel Chile (ENIC) is well positioned to outperform the market, as it exhibits above-average growth in financials.
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·8d ago·Negative
…A. leverages battery storage to manage excess renewable generation, enhancing grid flexibility and competitive positioning. Despite flat H1 2026 revenue (-0.5% YoY), ENIC delivered EBITDA growth (+3.9%) and net income growth (+10.7%), reflecting operational efficiency. Rising grid complexity and renewable integration create a competitive moat for ENIC, as its capabilities in storage and grid management become increasingly essential.
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Nov 4(in 6 weeks)
Consensus estimate $0.08 per share
Typical surprise -24.2% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$0.08 vs $0.08miss
- Wed, Apr 29$0.11 vs $0.09beat
- Tue, Mar 3$0.14 vs $0.15miss
- Wed, Oct 29$0.08 vs $0.11miss
- Tue, Jul 29$0.05 vs $0.08miss
- Mon, Apr 28$0.00 vs $0.08miss
Estimates and results for ENIC via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Congress trades
No disclosed congressional trades in ENIC.
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.