Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
100Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $52.60B | $5.81B | $2.66 |
| 2024 | $56.22B | $5.90B | $2.69 |
| 2023 | $49.72B | $5.53B | $2.53 |
| 2022 | $58.19B | $5.49B | $2.50 |
| 2021 | $40.81B | $4.64B | $2.11 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Thu, Oct 29(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.72 per share
Typical surprise +2.3% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Jul 30$0.84 vs $0.75beat
- Tue, Apr 28$0.68 vs $0.71miss
- Tue, Feb 3$0.75 vs $0.69beat
- Thu, Oct 30$0.61 vs $0.65miss
- Mon, Jul 28$0.66 vs $0.65beat
- Tue, Apr 29$0.64 vs $0.70miss
Estimates and results for EPD via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from EPD's reported EPS growth of 6.0% a year over 4 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $3.56
- Implied price
- $42.67
- Return from $38.90
- 1.9% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $21.22 — -45.5% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 | 16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -4.0% | -14.9% | -11.0% | -7.7% | -4.9% | -2.3% |
| 1.0% | -10.5% | -6.4% | -2.9% | 0.1% | 2.8% |
| 6.0% | -6.1% | -1.8% | 1.9% | 5.1% | 7.9% |
| 11.0% | -1.6% | 2.9% | 6.7% | 10.0% | 13.0% |
| 16.0% | 2.8% | 7.5% | 11.5% | 15.0% | 18.1% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (5)
- 4chan /biz/biz·3h ago·Neutral
>when you've been agonising over the past week about whether to leave your job as Deputy Assistant Head of Business Analytics Project Management for a Deputy Assistant Head of Enterprise Resource Planning Software Improvement and you realise only now how disgustingly boring and pointless each of the jobs are and how you achieve nothing in life no matter the choice Being a lower mid level wagie is a humiliation ritual.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·1d ago·Positive
Here's Why Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) is a Strong Momentum Stock Whether you're a value, growth, or momentum investor, finding strong stocks becomes easier with the Zacks Style Scores, a top feature of the Zacks Premium research service.
View source ↗ - News (RSS)venturebeat·1d ago·Neutral
Google’s Gemini 3.7 Flash targets coding and agents with a 50% introductory price cut Google is rolling out Gemini 3.7 Flash, a new version of its workhorse AI model that puts coding, agentic workflows and knowledge work at the center of the upgrade — while temporarily cutting API prices in half.The release arrives just three weeks after the release of Gemini 3.6 Flash, an unusually short turnaround that Google attributes to developer feedback and algorithmic improvements. For enterprise develop
View source ↗ - Newsfool.com·4d ago·Positive
Forget Oil Majors: This Midstream Stock Pays a Better Dividend Enterprise Products Partners' dividend yield of 5.8% surpasses that of major oil companies. The company operates a fee-based model that provides stability against commodity price volatility.
View source ↗ - Newsinvezz.com·4d ago·Neutral
Three dividend stocks to lock in $1,500 per year in passive income A $10,000 investment each in three high-yield dividend stocks: Realty Income, Enterprise Product Partners, and Hormel Foods can set you up for a reliable $1,500 per year in passive income. Of course, the distribution rate fluctuates with share price, but these three names have compounded through multiple economic cycles without cutting a payment.
View source ↗