Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
100Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.99B | $651.95M | $26.90 |
| 2024 | $1.72B | $512.81M | $20.78 |
| 2023 | $1.51B | $429.38M | $17.18 |
| 2022 | $1.38B | $373.54M | $14.34 |
| 2021 | $1.32B | $392.08M | $13.65 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Wed, Nov 4(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $11.08 per share
Typical surprise +4.4% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$12.18 vs $11.76beat
- Tue, Apr 28$12.50 vs $10.89beat
- Wed, Jan 28$7.33 vs $7.08beat
- Wed, Nov 5$7.74 vs $7.32beat
- Wed, Jul 30$8.57 vs $7.71beat
- Tue, Apr 29$7.81 vs $7.48beat
Estimates and results for FICO via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from FICO's reported EPS growth of 18.5% a year over 4 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $62.85
- Implied price
- $3,519
- Return from $1,086
- 26.5% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $1,750 — today's price is already 37.9% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 40 | 48 | 56 | 64 | 72 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.5% | 8.3% | 12.3% | 15.8% | 19.0% | 21.8% |
| 13.5% | 13.3% | 17.5% | 21.2% | 24.5% | 27.4% |
| 18.5% | 18.3% | 22.7% | 26.5% | 29.9% | 33.0% |
| 23.5% | 23.3% | 27.9% | 31.9% | 35.4% | 38.7% |
| 28.5% | 28.3% | 33.0% | 37.2% | 40.9% | 44.3% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (3)
- 4chan /biz/biz·13h ago·Neutral
>>62595524 Fair enough, you know more than I do about this stuff I'm guessing shareholders got exactly $0 of the settlement?
View source ↗ - PodcastAll In·2d ago·Negative
You can see that in the drone areas, an example, neither I ran or Ukraine have a navy and they both control waterways near their fronts. Tells you everything you need to know that you're not fighting two wars. You're fighting two different types of wars. And we got to get ready for that. So to me, this also is a slightly sickness of all you guys in media, which is where do we point the blame? I don't think Obama representing our cultural attractions around the globe. I do think America being pop
View source ↗ - PodcastCompound And Friends·4d ago·Neutral
like Manning. Fair. Fair. We did leave that up. What I wanted to say is, I think you preside over a company that right now is among the most important companies in Hollywood. I know you're not literally in Hollywood. But in my opinion, you can tell me if you think I'm right or wrong. I think nothing is more important to the livelihood of the movie business than an IMAX opened, and everyone is now figuring it out. I think the stock price reflects that and I think the casual fan understands that a
View source ↗