Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$1.86B+3.51%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Mary N. Dillon
- Sector
- Consumer Cyclical
- Industry
- Apparel - Retail
- Employees
- 13,140
- Beta
- 1.78
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 3 / 9 (Weak)
- Altman Z-score
- 2.05
Financials
Revenue
$1.86B+3.5%Net Income
$-38.00M-147.5%EBITDA
$24.00M-90.6%Free Cash Flow
$-44.00M-291.3%EPS (diluted)
$-0.40-170.2%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
95.60M-32.2%Operating Expenses
$468.00MCash & Debt
$299.00MReturn of Capital
$1.00MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$7.99BDividend per Share
$0.40Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | $7.99B | $12.00M | $0.13 |
| 2023 | $8.17B | $-330.00M | $-3.50 |
| 2022 | $8.76B | $342.00M | $3.63 |
| 2021 | $8.96B | $893.00M | $8.71 |
| 2020 | $7.55B | $323.00M | $3.10 |
| 2019 | $8.01B | $491.00M | $4.52 |
| 2018 | $7.94B | $541.00M | $4.68 |
| 2017 | $7.78B | $284.00M | $2.23 |
| 2016 | $7.77B | $664.00M | $4.95 |
| 2015 | $7.41B | $541.00M | $3.89 |
| 2014 | $7.15B | $520.00M | $3.61 |
| 2013 | $6.50B | $429.00M | $2.89 |
| 2012 | $6.18B | $397.00M | $2.62 |
| 2011 | $5.62B | $278.00M | $1.81 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from FL's reported EPS growth of -18.3% a year over 13 years. Historical EPS growth of -18% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.06
- Implied price
- $1.01
- Return from $24.01
- -46.9% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $0.50 — -97.9% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -56.8% | -54.9% | -53.2% | -51.7% | -50.4% |
| -20.0% | -54.0% | -51.9% | -50.1% | -48.5% | -47.1% |
| -15.0% | -51.1% | -48.8% | -46.9% | -45.3% | -43.8% |
| -10.0% | -48.2% | -45.8% | -43.8% | -42.1% | -40.5% |
| -5.0% | -45.3% | -42.8% | -40.7% | -38.9% | -37.2% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
93Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·6h ago·Neutral
DICK'S Sporting Goods: Foot Locker's Weakness Did Not Make It Cheap Enough DICK'S Sporting Goods shares fell 30% after Q2'26 earnings, driven by a 3.6% Foot Locker comp decline and weak guidance. I rate DKS as a hold, citing Foot Locker's underperformance, EMEA headwinds, and uncertainty around turnaround efforts. Core DKS remains resilient, posting 4.9% comp growth and maintaining full-year comp guidance, with ongoing market share gains.
View source ↗
Earnings
Typical surprise -21.4% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Aug 27$-0.27 vs $0.05miss
- Thu, May 29$-0.07 vs $-0.05miss
- Wed, Mar 5$0.86 vs $0.73beat
- Wed, Dec 4$0.33 vs $0.42miss
- Wed, Aug 28$-0.05 vs $-0.08beat
Estimates and results for FL via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by FL officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $87.9m
0 trades
12 trades
- Bracken Franklinsold
- Cipriano Giovannasold
- Vesa Equity Investment S.a R.l.sold
- Payne Ulice Jrsold
- Vesa Equity Investment S.a R.l.sold
- Vesa Equity Investment S.a R.l.sold
- Vesa Equity Investment S.a R.l.sold
- Vesa Equity Investment S.a R.l.sold
88 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.