FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

Mentions (9)

• 4chan /biz/biz·24d ago·Negative

  >>62683276 And these tickers. For a macro portfolio if you think there's going to be high inflation 40% FNDX 30% FNDF 10% HAP 10% SDCI 10% IAUM or split the last 20% between IAUM and KMLM. FND is US fundamental weighted, FNDF is international fundamental weight, HAP is global commodity producers, SDCI is commodity futures with a scarcity strategy, IAUM is gold, and KMLM is multi asset managed futures. But this is only a macro portfolio if you're bearish on the US. As well, you could roll HAP …

  View source ↗
• 4chan /biz/biz·25d ago·Neutral

  …ortfolio He said he doesn't want "internet s***" So I'm thinking this that will underweight software and overweight real economy. FNDX 50% (Schwab Fundamental US) FNDF 20% (Schwab Fundamental International) RAAX 30% (VanEck Real Assets) RAAX is basically industrials and commodity producers, basic materials, commodity futures, and gold futures, a little bit of REIT. The Schwab ETFs are broad market, but weighted toward fundamentals instead of market cap.

  View source ↗
• Newszacks.com·29d ago·Positive

  Is Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) a Strong ETF Right Now? Launched on 08/13/2013, the Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) is a smart beta exchange traded fund offering broad exposure to the Foreign Large Value ETF category of the market.

  View source ↗
• 4chan /biz/biz·33d ago·Negative

  …here right now. Effective exposure of equities is 85%,whilst equity budget is 75% SGRT 3 / SPMO 5 / CHAT 10 / IGM 7 / IUSG 3 FDL 6 / PWV 9 JQUA 5 / FMTM 5 / QFF 2 FNDF 9 / FNDE 2 / DXJ 3 VIS 2 / KWH 2 / SDCI 1.5 / NANR (or GNR) 1 YGLD 6 TYA 3.5 KMLM 5 / CTAP 2.5 / MATE 2 / WTLS 3 / RSSY 2.5 For reference, the CAGR of my portfolio is 13% and volatility is 13%. To compare it to QQQ, QQQ is 13% CAGR with a volatility of 20%. But the backtests for this portfolio aren't amazing because I didn't …

  View source ↗
• 4chan /biz/biz·41d ago·Negative

  …s portfolio a 3 sharpe on backtests just switching out 3 tickers. SGRT 3 / SPMO 5 / CHAT 10 / IGM 5 / IUSG 5 / FAD 1 FDL 4 / PWV 9 / HDV 2 JQUA 5 / FMTM 5 / QFF 2 FNDF 8 / FNDE 2 / DXJ 3 MADE 3 / GRID 1 / MXI 1 ERX 1.5 / YGLD 6 TYA 3.5 KMLM 5.5 / DBMF 4.5 / CTAP 5

  View source ↗
• 4chan /biz/biz·45d ago·Negative

  …6.0% SGRT 5.0% SPYG 5.0% QQQA 3.0% SLEEVE 2: US EQUITY CORE, VALUE AND MOMENTUM (27.0%) FDL 10.0% JQUA 7.0% DIVB 5.0% FMTM 5.0% SLEEVE 3: INTERNATIONAL VALUE (13.0%) FNDF 10.0% DXJ 3.0% SLEEVE 4: REAL ASSETS (12.5%) YGLD 6.0% MADE 3.0% ERX 1.5% GRID 1.0% MXI 1.0% SLEEVE 5: LIQUID AND TREND (18.5%) KMLM 5.5% CTA 5.0% DBMF 4.5% TYA 3.5%

  View source ↗
• 4chan /biz/biz·48d ago·Neutral

  …oward growth. Core Growth : SGRT 15% | CHAT 10% Broad Core / Value: FNDB 10% | HDV 5% (or SCHD, or FDL) Quality: JQUA 7.5% Momentum: FMTM 8% International / Value: FNDF 10% | DXJ 4.5% (or replace with favourite region) Infrastructure / Physical Economy: PAVE 3.5% | GRID 1.5% Real Assets / Commodities: ERX 3.5% Gold: YGLD 6.5% Managed Futures: KMLM 4.5% DBMF 3.5% FFUT 3.0% CTA 2.0% IMF 2.0%

  View source ↗
• 4chan /biz/biz·52d ago·Neutral

  Is there a better international only ETF that's better than FNDF? I like how it has a heavy value tilt, but it seems to avoid most value traps. I hate how it has 6% memory and semis in it, but that's because of the commodity cycle they're in. Normally they wouldn't be in it. Tell me your thoughts of the best intl ETFs.

  View source ↗
• Newsseekingalpha.com·59d ago·Positive

  FNDF: Proven Value Approach Yields Solid Returns The Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF is rated a buy, supported by strong performance, disciplined rebalancing, and attractive valuation metrics versus peers. FNDF's contrarian, fundamentals-based weighting and sector diversification have driven outperformance over the MSCI EAFE Index and peer ETFs across multiple timeframes. The fund offers a 3.0% yield, a low expense ratio, and has consistently captured more upside while limiting downs

  View source ↗