Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
107Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $160.56B | $14.36B | $0.00 |
| 2024 | $151.36B | $16.98B | $0.00 |
| 2023 | $140.94B | $17.41B | $0.00 |
| 2022 | $116.81B | $12.92B | $0.00 |
| 2021 | $100.33B | $22.18B | $0.01 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Wed, Nov 4(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $0.65 per share
Typical surprise -7.5% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$0.68 vs $0.63beat
- Wed, Apr 29$0.63 vs $0.63beat
- Wed, Feb 11$0.60 vs $0.65miss
- Wed, Oct 29$0.65 vs $0.72miss
- Wed, Jul 30$0.57 vs $0.68miss
- Wed, Apr 30$0.62 vs $0.67miss
Estimates and results for FNMA via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by FNMA officers and directors.
- Bought
- $51k
- Sold
- $69k
1 trade
4 trades
- Stucky Michaelsold
- Stucky Michaelbought
- Fink Gregory Asold
- Hisey David Csold
- Hisey David Csold
54 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from FNMA's reported EPS growth of -42.0% a year over 4 years. Historical EPS growth of -42% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $1.09
- Implied price
- $19.55
- Return from $6.22
- 25.7% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $9.72 — today's price is already 36.0% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | 2.3% | 7.0% | 11.0% | 14.4% | 17.5% |
| -20.0% | 9.1% | 14.1% | 18.3% | 22.1% | 25.4% |
| -15.0% | 15.9% | 21.2% | 25.7% | 29.7% | 33.2% |
| -10.0% | 22.8% | 28.4% | 33.1% | 37.3% | 41.0% |
| -5.0% | 29.6% | 35.5% | 40.5% | 44.9% | 48.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newsdefenseworld.net·6h ago·Neutral
Brokerages Set Fannie Mae (OTCMKTS:FNMA) Price Target at $12.25 Shares of Fannie Mae (OTCMKTS:FNMA - Get Free Report) have been given an average recommendation of "Hold" by the seven brokerages that are covering the company, Marketbeat.com reports. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, four have assigned a hold rating, one has issued a buy rating and one has given
View source ↗