Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$43.99M+103.76%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Arthur S. Cooper
- Sector
- Real Estate
- Industry
- REIT - Diversified
- Employees
- 75
- Beta
- 1.07
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 7 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- -0.26
Financials
Revenue
$43.99M+103.8%Net Income
$8.27MEBITDA
$34.70M+120.7%Free Cash Flow
$16.04MEPS (diluted)
$0.11Shares Outstanding (diluted)
47.22M+93.0%Operating Expenses
$1.18MCash & Debt
$10.36MReturn of Capital
$18.12MDividend per Share
$0.10Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $161.34M | $19.29M | $0.41 |
| 2024 | $149.39M | $24.00M | $0.26 |
| 2023 | $147.58M | $4.99M | $-0.19 |
| 2022 | $148.98M | $10.80M | $-0.04 |
| 2021 | $137.69M | $10.94M | $-0.09 |
| 2020 | $133.15M | $14.94M | $0.09 |
| 2019 | $114.39M | $9.63M | $-0.16 |
| 2018 | $106.80M | $12.32M | $0.03 |
| 2017 | $94.80M | $5.94M | $-0.19 |
| 2016 | $86.37M | $3.96M | $-0.16 |
| 2015 | $83.77M | $3.60M | $-0.07 |
| 2014 | $73.76M | $-5.90M | $-0.33 |
| 2013 | $61.34M | $-2.87M | $-0.22 |
| 2012 | $51.27M | $3.76M | $0.33 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from GOOD's reported EPS growth of 1.7% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.44
- Implied price
- $11.56
- Return from $13.03
- -2.4% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $5.75 — -55.9% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 18 | 22 | 26 | 30 | 34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -8.3% | -18.2% | -14.9% | -12.0% | -9.4% | -7.1% |
| -3.3% | -13.8% | -10.2% | -7.2% | -4.5% | -2.1% |
| 1.7% | -9.3% | -5.6% | -2.4% | 0.5% | 3.0% |
| 6.7% | -4.8% | -0.9% | 2.4% | 5.4% | 8.1% |
| 11.7% | -0.4% | 3.7% | 7.2% | 10.3% | 13.1% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
100Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newszacks.com·1d ago·Neutral
Brokers Suggest Investing in Gladstone Commercial (GOOD): Read This Before Placing a Bet When deciding whether to buy, sell, or hold a stock, investors often rely on analyst recommendations. Media reports about rating changes by these brokerage-firm-employed (or sell-side) analysts often influence a stock's price, but are they really important?
View source ↗
Earnings
Mon, Nov 2(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.03 per share
Typical surprise +60.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Aug 5$0.11 vs $0.04beat
- Tue, May 5$0.08 vs $0.05beat
- Wed, Feb 18$0.37 vs $0.02beat
- Mon, Nov 3$0.02 vs $0.08miss
- Wed, Aug 6$0.03 vs $0.08miss
- Wed, May 7$0.04 vs $0.03beat
Estimates and results for GOOD via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by GOOD officers and directors.
- Bought
- $1.4m
- Sold
- $63k
82 trades
2 trades
- Carter Ryan Stuartbought
- Carter Ryan Stuartbought
- Carter Ryan Stuartbought
- Carter Ryan Stuartbought
- Carter Ryan Stuartbought
- Gerson Garybought
- Gerson Garybought
- Gerson Garybought
16 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.