Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$493.84M+438.71%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- James R. Brickman
- Sector
- Consumer Cyclical
- Industry
- Residential Construction
- Employees
- 620
- Beta
- 1.80
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 5 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 6.19
Financials
Revenue
$493.84M+438.7%Net Income
$74.17M+1088.1%EBITDA
$100.55M+745.0%Free Cash Flow
$-12.98MEPS (diluted)
$1.70+1207.7%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
43.28M-11.5%Operating Expenses
$54.40MCash & Debt
$131.64MReturn of Capital
$11.56MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$2.10BQuote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.04B | $313.23M | $7.09 |
| 2024 | $2.10B | $381.58M | $8.51 |
| 2023 | $1.78B | $284.63M | $6.20 |
| 2022 | $1.76B | $291.90M | $6.07 |
| 2021 | $1.40B | $190.21M | $3.75 |
| 2020 | $976.02M | $113.69M | $2.25 |
| 2019 | $791.66M | $58.66M | $1.16 |
| 2018 | $623.65M | $51.62M | $1.02 |
| 2017 | $454.37M | $14.97M | $0.30 |
| 2016 | $380.33M | $23.76M | $0.49 |
| 2015 | $291.14M | $15.32M | $0.38 |
| 2014 | $246.10M | $50.03M | $3.40 |
| 2013 | $298.43M | $-39.21M | $-5.06 |
| 2012 | $463.28M | $-39.84M | $-5.28 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $10.51
- Implied price
- $94.59
- Return from $73.78
- 5.1% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $47.03 — -36.3% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -15.2% | -9.3% | -4.6% | -0.7% | 2.6% |
| 3.0% | -10.9% | -4.7% | 0.2% | 4.3% | 7.9% |
| 8.0% | -6.6% | -0.1% | 5.1% | 9.4% | 13.1% |
| 13.0% | -2.2% | 4.6% | 10.0% | 14.5% | 18.4% |
| 18.0% | 2.1% | 9.2% | 14.8% | 19.5% | 23.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
120Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsbusinesswire.com·6h ago·Positive
GHO Homes Continues Streak with Sixth Consecutive Builder of the Year Award PORT ST. LUCIE, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--GRBK GHO Homes, LLC d/b/a GHO Homes, a subsidiary of Green Brick Partners, Inc. (NYSE: GRBK), has earned the Builder of the Year award for the sixth consecutive year from the Treasure Coast Community Choice Awards. The Treasure Coast Community Choice Award celebrates local businesses and organizations that have made an impact on the region. Driven entirely by public nominations and …
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Oct 28(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $1.47 per share
Typical surprise +12.1% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$1.70 vs $1.42beat
- Wed, Apr 29$1.39 vs $1.24beat
- Wed, Feb 25$1.78 vs $1.62beat
- Wed, Oct 29$1.77 vs $1.43beat
- Wed, Jul 30$1.85 vs $1.64beat
- Wed, Apr 30$1.67 vs $1.76miss
Estimates and results for GRBK via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by GRBK officers and directors.
- Bought
- $70.3m
- Sold
- $134.6m
1 trade
18 trades
- Press Richard Ssold
- Press Richard Ssold
- Press Richard Ssold
- Press Richard Ssold
- Press Richard Ssold
- Dolson Jedsold
- Dolson Jedsold
- Suit Neal Jsold
81 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.