Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$389.00M-15.19%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Jeremy Blue Ford
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Financial - Conglomerates
- Employees
- 3,525
- Beta
- 0.88
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.31
Financials
Revenue
$389.00M-15.2%Net Income
$36.52M-29.7%EBITDA
$50.05M-32.9%Free Cash Flow
$-150.84M-223.1%EPS (diluted)
$0.63+18.9%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
57.95M-41.2%Operating Expenses
$44.20MCash & Debt
$2.73BReturn of Capital
$58.61MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$431.97MDividend per Share
$0.22Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.63B | $165.59M | $2.64 |
| 2024 | $1.54B | $113.21M | $1.74 |
| 2023 | $1.50B | $109.65M | $1.69 |
| 2022 | $1.35B | $113.13M | $1.61 |
| 2021 | $1.85B | $374.50M | $4.64 |
| 2020 | $2.16B | $447.84M | $4.59 |
| 2019 | $1.61B | $225.29M | $2.44 |
| 2018 | $1.39B | $121.44M | $1.28 |
| 2017 | $1.63B | $132.54M | $1.36 |
| 2016 | $1.65B | $145.89M | $1.48 |
| 2015 | $1.54B | $210.97M | $2.10 |
| 2014 | $1.10B | $111.65M | $1.18 |
| 2013 | $1.09B | $125.34M | $1.43 |
| 2012 | $213.07M | $-5.59M | $-0.10 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $3.88
- Implied price
- $50.45
- Return from $38.90
- 5.3% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $25.08 — -35.5% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 9 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 17 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -11.2% | -7.6% | -4.4% | -1.6% | 0.9% |
| 3.0% | -6.7% | -2.8% | 0.5% | 3.4% | 6.0% |
| 8.0% | -2.1% | 1.9% | 5.3% | 8.4% | 11.1% |
| 13.0% | 2.4% | 6.6% | 10.2% | 13.4% | 16.3% |
| 18.0% | 6.9% | 11.3% | 15.1% | 18.4% | 21.4% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
125+4.17%Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newszacks.com·6h ago·Positive
HTH Gains 13.5% So Far This Year: Should You Buy the Stock Now? Hilltop Holdings gains 13.5% so far this year as improving margins, expense discipline and capital strength offset asset-quality and mortgage banking risks.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·1d ago·Positive
HTH's NII Increases 5.6% Y/Y in 1H26: Will the Uptrend Continue? Hilltop Holdings' NII rises 5.6% in 1H26 as lower funding costs and loan growth help.
View source ↗
Earnings
Thu, Oct 22(in 7 weeks)
Consensus estimate $0.64 per share
Typical surprise +46.5% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Jul 23$0.63 vs $0.49beat
- Thu, Apr 23$0.64 vs $0.54beat
- Thu, Jan 29$0.69 vs $0.46beat
- Thu, Oct 23$0.74 vs $0.51beat
- Thu, Jul 24$0.57 vs $0.41beat
- Thu, Apr 24$0.65 vs $0.28beat
Estimates and results for HTH via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by HTH officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $15.4m
0 trades
19 trades
- Bobbitt Rhodes Rsold
- Bobbitt Rhodes Rsold
- Bobbitt Rhodes Rsold
- Bobbitt Rhodes Rsold
- Bobbitt Rhodes Rsold
- Bobbitt Rhodes Rsold
- Bobbitt Rhodes Rsold
- Bobbitt Rhodes Rsold
81 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
