Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$22.07M+107.38%Company Profile
- CEO
- Russell C. Burk
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Asset Management - Income
- Beta
- 0.77
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 7 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 1.33
Financials
Revenue
$22.07M+107.4%Net Income
$50.59M+201.6%EBITDA
$55.90M+217.9%Free Cash Flow
$10.36M-2.0%EPS (diluted)
$1.07+30.5%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
47.07M+127.5%Operating Expenses
$0.00Cash & Debt
$0.00Return of Capital
$21.58MDividend per Share
$0.08Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $37.96M | $18.62M | $0.40 |
| 2024 | $44.15M | $21.42M | $0.46 |
| 2023 | $44.60M | $46.32M | $0.98 |
| 2022 | $-87.47M | $-87.85M | $-1.87 |
| 2021 | $-3.60M | $-3.91M | $-0.08 |
| 2020 | $4.82M | $4.44M | $0.09 |
| 2019 | $102.65M | $102.09M | $2.17 |
| 2018 | $29.29M | $28.67M | $0.61 |
| 2017 | $29.57M | $29.05M | $0.61 |
| 2016 | $50.03M | $-397.8K | $-0.01 |
| 2015 | $50.18M | $46.84M | $1.00 |
| 2014 | $47.53M | $91.67M | $1.95 |
| 2013 | $47.49M | $-16.58M | $-0.35 |
| 2012 | $30.89M | $38.82M | $0.83 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from IIM's reported EPS growth of -5.5% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.30
- Implied price
- $9.83
- Return from $12.54
- -4.7% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $4.89 — -61.0% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 23 | 28 | 33 | 38 | 43 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -15.5% | -20.8% | -17.6% | -14.8% | -12.4% | -10.2% |
| -10.5% | -16.1% | -12.7% | -9.8% | -7.2% | -4.9% |
| -5.5% | -11.4% | -7.8% | -4.7% | -2.0% | 0.4% |
| -0.5% | -6.7% | -3.0% | 0.3% | 3.2% | 5.7% |
| 4.5% | -2.0% | 1.9% | 5.3% | 8.3% | 11.1% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
100Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·5h ago·Neutral
IIM: Climbing To A Premium Helps Buoy Results But Underlying Issues Remain Invesco Value Municipal Income Trust now trades at a premium, prompted partly by a declining NAV, making it less appealing for new investment. IIM's high 7.43% distribution yield is lacking coverage from net investment income, leading to destructive return of capital distributions. Rising risk-free rates and IIM's high leverage-adjusted duration (12.6 years) increase interest rate sensitivity and downside risk on top of t…
View source ↗
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by IIM officers and directors.
- Bought
- $90.3m
- Sold
- $19.3m
8 trades
4 trades
- O'reilly Timothy Msold
- O'reilly Timothy Msold
- O'reilly Timothy Mbought
- O'reilly Timothy Mbought
- Connelly Jackbought
- Connelly Jackbought
- Connelly Jackbought
- Connelly Jackbought
88 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.