Price
No data yet.
Signal Score (90d)
120Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $410.21M | $34.88M | $0.65 |
| 2024 | $352.21M | $26.06M | $0.49 |
| 2023 | $374.84M | $25.34M | $0.47 |
| 2022 | $300.81M | $-22.80M | $-0.40 |
| 2021 | $254.88M | $-22.33M | $-0.38 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Thu, Oct 22(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.53 per share
Typical surprise +34.1% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Jul 23$0.43 vs $0.30beat
- Thu, Apr 30$0.17 vs $0.15beat
- Wed, Feb 25$0.58 vs $0.43beat
- Thu, Oct 23$0.47 vs $0.35beat
- Thu, Jul 24$0.26 vs $0.19beat
- Wed, Apr 23$0.13 vs $0.11beat
Estimates and results for IMAX via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by IMAX officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $36.8m
0 trades
15 trades
- Zlatar Jose Aleksandrsold
- Gelfond Richard Lsold
- Gelfond Richard Lsold
- Gelfond Richard Lsold
- Gelfond Richard Lsold
- Gelfond Richard Lsold
- Gelfond Richard Lsold
- Gelfond Richard Lsold
85 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.96
- Implied price
- $54.46
- Return from $52.30
- 0.8% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $27.08 — -48.2% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 39 | 48 | 57 | 66 | 75 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -15.2% | -11.6% | -8.5% | -5.8% | -3.4% |
| 3.0% | -10.9% | -7.1% | -3.9% | -1.0% | 1.6% |
| 8.0% | -6.6% | -2.6% | 0.8% | 3.8% | 6.5% |
| 13.0% | -2.2% | 1.9% | 5.5% | 8.6% | 11.4% |
| 18.0% | 2.1% | 6.4% | 10.1% | 13.4% | 16.4% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newszacks.com·5h ago·Positive
Imax (IMAX) is a Top-Ranked Growth Stock: Should You Buy? Wondering how to pick strong, market-beating stocks for your investment portfolio? Look no further than the Zacks Style Scores.
View source ↗
