Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$5.23M-52.81%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Abigail Wendel
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Banks - Regional
- Employees
- 273
- Beta
- 0.38
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.49
Financials
Revenue
$5.23M-52.8%Net Income
$5.39M+150.1%EBITDA
$-6.87M-301.7%Free Cash Flow
$3.53M-54.4%EPS (diluted)
$0.87+141.7%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
6.15M+6.7%Operating Expenses
$5.76MCash & Debt
$367.08MReturn of Capital
$1.28MDividend per Share
$0.21Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $95.97M | $18.77M | $3.09 |
| 2024 | $88.64M | $13.00M | $2.26 |
| 2023 | $77.91M | $12.24M | $2.12 |
| 2022 | $56.93M | $9.88M | $1.71 |
| 2021 | $62.09M | $18.01M | $3.12 |
| 2020 | $66.61M | $19.49M | $3.37 |
| 2019 | $52.92M | $10.66M | $1.82 |
| 2018 | $48.72M | $10.43M | $1.79 |
| 2017 | $36.90M | $4.37M | $0.76 |
| 2016 | $44.08M | $8.96M | $1.59 |
| 2015 | $46.01M | $10.51M | $1.93 |
| 2014 | $42.92M | $8.05M | $1.49 |
| 2013 | $32.82M | $4.66M | $0.88 |
| 2012 | $34.49M | $6.37M | $1.21 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from LARK's reported EPS growth of 7.5% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $4.44
- Implied price
- $35.52
- Return from $31.36
- 2.5% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $17.66 — -43.7% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.5% | -19.1% | -12.2% | -7.0% | -2.8% | 0.8% |
| 2.5% | -14.9% | -7.7% | -2.2% | 2.2% | 6.0% |
| 7.5% | -10.7% | -3.2% | 2.5% | 7.2% | 11.2% |
| 12.5% | -6.6% | 1.3% | 7.3% | 12.2% | 16.4% |
| 17.5% | -2.4% | 5.8% | 12.1% | 17.2% | 21.5% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
120+0.00%Social Signal Score
Mentions (4)
- Newszacks.com·12d ago·Positive
Landmark Bancorp (LARK) is a Top Dividend Stock Right Now: Should You Buy? Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Landmark Bancorp (LARK) have what it takes?
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·28d ago·Positive
This is Why Landmark Bancorp (LARK) is a Great Dividend Stock Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Landmark Bancorp (LARK) have what it takes?
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·45d ago·Positive
Landmark Bancorp (LARK) Could Be a Great Choice Dividends are one of the best benefits to being a shareholder, but finding a great dividend stock is no easy task. Does Landmark Bancorp (LARK) have what it takes?
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·49d ago·Positive
LARK Distilling Co. Ltd. (LRKKF) Q4 2026 Earnings Call Transcript LARK Distilling Co. Ltd. (LRKKF) Q4 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Nov 4(in 4 weeks)
Consensus estimate $0.89 per share
Typical surprise +6.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jul 29$0.88 vs $0.83beat
Estimates and results for LARK via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by LARK officers and directors.
- Bought
- $5.2m
- Sold
- $2.8m
31 trades
32 trades
- Lewis Jimsold
- Alexander Patrick Lsold
- Kohlrus Mark J.bought
- Kohlrus Mark J.bought
- Lewis Jimsold
- Lewis Jimsold
- Lewis Jimsold
- Lewis Jimsold
37 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Congress trades
No disclosed congressional trades in LARK.
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.