Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Analyst Ratings
11 analystsRevenue
$615.86M-33.77%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Eilif Serck-Hanssen
- Sector
- Consumer Defensive
- Industry
- Education & Training Services
- Employees
- 33,900
- Beta
- 0.44
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 3.87
Financials
Revenue
$615.86M-33.8%Net Income
$137.10M+58.8%EBITDA
$254.29M+1.9%Free Cash Flow
$83.95M-60.5%EPS (diluted)
$0.98+48.5%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
141.56M+5.5%Operating Expenses
$14.24MCash & Debt
$161.67MReturn of Capital
$77.84MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$-344.75MDividend per Share
$0.70Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.70B | $281.63M | $1.91 |
| 2024 | $1.57B | $296.47M | $1.93 |
| 2023 | $1.48B | $107.59M | $0.75 |
| 2022 | $1.24B | $69.57M | $0.37 |
| 2021 | $1.09B | $192.45M | $-2.34 |
| 2020 | $1.02B | $-613.33M | $-1.53 |
| 2019 | $1.21B | $938.48M | $0.06 |
| 2018 | $1.14B | $370.07M | $1.74 |
| 2017 | $3.33B | $91.47M | $-1.20 |
| 2016 | $3.30B | $371.85M | $2.79 |
| 2015 | $4.29B | $-316.25M | $-2.39 |
| 2014 | $4.41B | $-158.29M | $-1.19 |
| 2013 | $3.91B | $-69.68M | $-0.52 |
| 2012 | $3.57B | $-201.06M | $-1.51 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $2.80
- Implied price
- $50.39
- Return from $36.13
- 6.9% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $25.05 — -30.7% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -10.6% | -6.5% | -3.0% | 0.0% | 2.7% |
| 3.0% | -6.0% | -1.7% | 1.9% | 5.1% | 8.0% |
| 8.0% | -1.4% | 3.1% | 6.9% | 10.2% | 13.2% |
| 13.0% | 3.1% | 7.8% | 11.8% | 15.3% | 18.4% |
| 18.0% | 7.7% | 12.6% | 16.8% | 20.4% | 23.7% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
120Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- News (RSS)seekingalpha·2h ago·Positive
Laureate Education Continues To Teach Why It's Worth Buying
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·6h ago·Positive
Laureate Education Continues To Teach Why It's Worth Buying Laureate Education remains a 'buy' as revenue and profitability guidance are raised, with continued strong growth and low valuation multiples. Q2 2026 revenue grew 17.5% YoY to $615.9M, with net income and cash flows also showing robust increases. Mexico and Peru drive enrollment and revenue expansion, benefiting from favorable market structures and currency effects.
View source ↗
Earnings
Thu, Oct 29(in 5 weeks)
Consensus estimate $0.47 per share
Typical surprise +21.3% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Jul 30$1.00 vs $0.96beat
- Thu, Apr 30$-0.17 vs $-0.22beat
- Thu, Feb 19$0.76 vs $0.76beat
- Thu, Oct 30$0.25 vs $0.79miss
- Thu, Jul 31$0.79 vs $0.23beat
- Thu, May 1$-0.11 vs $-0.33beat
Estimates and results for LAUR via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by LAUR officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $34.2m
0 trades
18 trades
- Snow Ian Kendellsold
- Snow Ian Kendellsold
- Snow Ian Kendellsold
- Cardoso Marcelosold
- Buskirk Richard M.sold
- Buskirk Richard M.sold
- Cardoso Marcelosold
- Rodin Judithsold
82 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Congress trades
- Donna Shalalahouse · FL27 · disclosed Apr 27, 2020 (308d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
- Donna Shalalahouse · FL27 · disclosed Apr 27, 2020 (328d later)Buy$1,001 - $15,000
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.