Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Analyst Ratings
5 analystsRevenue
$465.56MAnalyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- James A. Beck
- Sector
- Basic Materials
- Industry
- Gold
- Employees
- 1,703
- Beta
- 1.46
- Country
- CA
- Piotroski score
- 5 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 12.30
Financials
Revenue
$465.56M+1163.2%Net Income
$214.29MEBITDA
$337.57MFree Cash Flow
$100.43MEPS (diluted)
$0.88Shares Outstanding (diluted)
242.80M+2.5%Operating Expenses
$1.81MCash & Debt
$506.52MReturn of Capital
$285.20MDividend per Share
$1.08Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.81B | $806.02M | $3.34 |
| 2024 | $1.19B | $426.05M | $1.78 |
| 2023 | $902.52M | $179.46M | $0.76 |
| 2022 | $815.67M | $73.56M | $0.31 |
| 2021 | $733.33M | $221.43M | $0.95 |
| 2020 | $358.16M | $-47.16M | $-0.21 |
| 2019 | $0.00 | $-118.94M | $-0.54 |
| 2018 | $0.00 | $-22.07M | $-0.12 |
| 2017 | $0.00 | $-41.14M | $-0.35 |
| 2016 | $0.00 | $-62.81M | $-0.58 |
| 2015 | $0.00 | $-45.32M | $-0.45 |
| 2014 | $0.00 | $-749.0K | $-0.04 |
| 2013 | $0.00 | $-259.0K | $-0.02 |
| 2012 | $0.00 | $-466.0K | $-0.03 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $4.91
- Implied price
- $122.84
- Return from $61.53
- 14.8% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $61.07 — -0.7% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 17 | 21 | 25 | 29 | 33 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -3.5% | 0.6% | 4.2% | 7.3% | 10.1% |
| 3.0% | 1.4% | 5.8% | 9.5% | 12.8% | 15.8% |
| 8.0% | 6.3% | 10.9% | 14.8% | 18.3% | 21.4% |
| 13.0% | 11.2% | 16.0% | 20.1% | 23.8% | 27.0% |
| 18.0% | 16.1% | 21.2% | 25.5% | 29.2% | 32.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
100+25.00%Social Signal Score
Mentions (3)
- Newsmarketbeat.com·2d ago·Neutral
Lundin Gold Eyes Fruta del Norte Expansion to Sustain 500,000-Ounce Output Lundin Gold TSE: LUG said it is moving ahead with plans to expand processing capacity at its Fruta del Norte gold mine in Ecuador, supported by exploration success at nearby deposits and a larger reserve base than the company had when it approved construction.
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·7d ago·Positive
Lundin Gold: Fair Value, Resource Conversion, And Improved Operations Offer Upside Ludin Gold is rated Buy due to near-term operational milestones and a robust dividend yield. Current operations at Fruta del Norte are strong, with production guidance on track and AISC below $1,200/oz. Upcoming mill expansion, resource upgrades at FDN East/South, and Sandia exploration could drive valuation higher.
View source ↗ - Newsmarketbeat.com·57d ago·Negative
Lundin Gold Q2 Earnings Call Highlights Lundin Gold TSE: LUG said its Fruta del Norte mine delivered steady operating results in the second quarter of 2026, producing approximately 119,000 ounces of gold and keeping the company on track to meet its full-year production guidance.
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Nov 4(in 4 weeks)
Consensus estimate $1.07 per share
Typical surprise +2.1% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Aug 6$0.82 vs $0.86miss
- Wed, May 6$1.05 vs $1.02beat
- Thu, Feb 19$0.92 vs $0.93miss
- Thu, Nov 6$0.82 vs $0.72beat
- Thu, Aug 7$0.79 vs $0.77beat
- Thu, May 8$0.59 vs $0.53beat
Estimates and results for LUGDF via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Congress trades
No disclosed congressional trades in LUGDF.
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.