Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$9.67M+11.65%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Robert Capps
- Sector
- Technology
- Industry
- Hardware, Equipment & Parts
- Employees
- 157
- Beta
- 0.38
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 4 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 1.52
Financials
Revenue
$9.67M+11.6%Net Income
$-411.0KEBITDA
$293.0KFree Cash Flow
$-1.39M-209.1%EPS (diluted)
$-0.05Shares Outstanding (diluted)
9.09M+88.3%Operating Expenses
$3.85MCash & Debt
$17.66MReturn of Capital
$0.00Revenue by Segment (annual)
$35.09MDividend per Share
$0.56Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $40.95M | $750.0K | $0.09 |
| 2025 | $46.86M | $5.07M | $0.64 |
| 2024 | $36.51M | $-2.07M | $-0.38 |
| 2023 | $25.01M | $-8.83M | $-8.98 |
| 2022 | $23.11M | $-15.09M | $-2.46 |
| 2021 | $21.21M | $-18.45M | $-3.56 |
| 2020 | $29.92M | $-11.29M | $-9.30 |
| 2019 | $42.94M | $-19.84M | $-16.39 |
| 2018 | $48.28M | $-21.07M | $-17.44 |
| 2017 | $41.00M | $-33.15M | $-27.47 |
| 2016 | $51.82M | $-38.74M | $-32.17 |
| 2015 | $83.15M | $-9.19M | $-7.37 |
| 2014 | $92.11M | $4.77M | $3.70 |
| 2013 | $104.69M | $17.05M | $13.40 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from MIND's reported EPS growth of -31.9% a year over 13 years. Historical EPS growth of -32% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.04
- Implied price
- $0.66
- Return from $4.30
- -31.2% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $0.33 — -92.3% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -44.0% | -41.5% | -39.3% | -37.4% | -35.7% |
| -20.0% | -40.3% | -37.6% | -35.3% | -33.2% | -31.4% |
| -15.0% | -36.6% | -33.7% | -31.2% | -29.1% | -27.1% |
| -10.0% | -32.8% | -29.8% | -27.2% | -24.9% | -22.8% |
| -5.0% | -29.1% | -25.9% | -23.1% | -20.7% | -18.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
100Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsprnewswire.com·6h ago·Neutral
MIND Technology Announces Fiscal 2027 Second Quarter Earnings Release and Conference Call Schedule THE WOODLANDS, Texas, Aug. 25, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- MIND Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: MIND) announced today that it will release financial results for its fiscal 2027 second quarter ended July 31, 2026 after the market closes on Tuesday, September 8, 2026. In conjunction with the release, the Company has scheduled a conference call, which will be broadcast live over the Internet, for Wednesday, Septem…
View source ↗
Earnings
Tue, Sep 8(in 13 days)
Consensus estimate $-0.08 per share
Typical surprise -33.7% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Apr 15$-0.03 vs $0.31miss
- Tue, Dec 9$0.01 vs $0.16miss
- Tue, Sep 9$0.24 vs $0.19beat
- Tue, Jun 10$-0.12 vs $0.19miss
- Tue, Apr 22$0.25 vs $0.18beat
- Tue, Dec 10$2.87 vs $0.13beat
Estimates and results for MIND via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by MIND officers and directors.
- Bought
- $895k
- Sold
- $8k
30 trades
1 trade
- Blum Peter Hbought
- Blum Peter Hbought
- Blum Peter Hbought
- Blum Peter Hbought
- Blum Peter Hbought
- Blum Peter Hbought
- Blum Peter Hbought
- Blum Peter Hbought
69 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
