Price (90d)
$19.19Signal Score (90d)
90Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $197.55M | $34.43M | $0.64 |
| 2024 | $174.48M | $-43.69M | $-0.86 |
| 2023 | $166.23M | $55.30M | $1.16 |
| 2022 | $110.42M | $-81.08M | $-1.71 |
| 2021 | $136.54M | $-56.71M | $-1.25 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Wed, Nov 4(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $0.19 per share
Typical surprise -15.4% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Aug 5$0.14 vs $0.28miss
- Wed, May 6$0.56 vs $0.32beat
- Thu, Mar 12$0.66 vs $0.17beat
- Wed, Nov 5$-0.01 vs $0.31miss
- Wed, Aug 6$0.06 vs $0.09miss
- Wed, May 7$-0.12 vs $-0.14beat
Estimates and results for MUX via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.94
- Implied price
- $27.15
- Return from $18.80
- 7.6% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $13.50 — -28.2% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 21 | 25 | 29 | 33 | 37 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -8.4% | -5.2% | -2.3% | 0.2% | 2.5% |
| 3.0% | -3.8% | -0.4% | 2.6% | 5.3% | 7.8% |
| 8.0% | 0.9% | 4.5% | 7.6% | 10.4% | 13.0% |
| 13.0% | 5.6% | 9.3% | 12.6% | 15.6% | 18.2% |
| 18.0% | 10.2% | 14.2% | 17.6% | 20.7% | 23.5% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newsmarketbeat.com·6d ago·Negative
McEwen Q2 Earnings Call Highlights McEwen NYSE: MUX said its second-quarter operational performance fell short of expectations, citing lower production and elevated costs, while management outlined steps to improve recoveries at its Gold Bar mine and advance the Los Azules copper project toward a final investment decision.
View source ↗