Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$81.15M+72.45%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Eric Stang
- Sector
- Communication Services
- Industry
- Telecommunications Services
- Employees
- 1,420
- Beta
- 1.20
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 5 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 3.11
Financials
Revenue
$81.15M+72.4%Net Income
$2.58MEBITDA
$8.72M+1255.5%Free Cash Flow
$4.93M+230.2%EPS (diluted)
$0.09Shares Outstanding (diluted)
28.10M+20.3%Operating Expenses
$47.16MCash & Debt
$17.16MReturn of Capital
$4.61MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$273.60MQuote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $273.60M | $6.46M | $0.23 |
| 2025 | $256.85M | $-6.90M | $-0.26 |
| 2024 | $236.74M | $-835.0K | $-0.03 |
| 2023 | $216.16M | $-3.65M | $-0.15 |
| 2022 | $192.29M | $-1.57M | $-0.07 |
| 2021 | $168.95M | $-2.44M | $-0.11 |
| 2020 | $151.59M | $-18.80M | $-0.89 |
| 2019 | $129.23M | $-14.57M | $-0.74 |
| 2018 | $114.49M | $-13.12M | $-0.71 |
| 2017 | $104.52M | $-12.95M | $-0.74 |
| 2016 | $88.78M | $-14.05M | $-0.83 |
| 2015 | $72.20M | $-6.41M | $-0.56 |
| 2014 | $53.66M | $-2.00M | $-0.17 |
| 2013 | $39.23M | $-3.66M | $-0.32 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.34
- Implied price
- $17.56
- Return from $20.51
- -3.1% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $8.73 — -57.4% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 35 | 43 | 51 | 59 | 67 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -18.4% | -15.0% | -12.0% | -9.4% | -7.1% |
| 3.0% | -14.2% | -10.6% | -7.5% | -4.8% | -2.4% |
| 8.0% | -10.1% | -6.3% | -3.1% | -0.2% | 2.4% |
| 13.0% | -5.9% | -2.0% | 1.4% | 4.4% | 7.1% |
| 18.0% | -1.8% | 2.4% | 5.9% | 9.1% | 11.9% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
120Social Signal Score
Mentions (1)
- Newsbusinesswire.com·6h ago·Positive
…ost Investor Meetings at the “BIG 10”, the 10th Annual Lake Street Capital Markets Best Ideas Growth Conference SUNNYVALE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Ooma, Inc. (NYSE: OOMA), a provider of advanced communications services for businesses and consumers, today announced the following conference participation: What: The BIG 10, Lake Street Capital Markets 10th Annual Best Ideas Growth Conference, in-person one-on-one meetings When: September 10, 2026 Who: Ooma CEO Eric Stang Where: New York Lake Stree…
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Aug 26(in 5 days)
Consensus estimate $0.33 per share
Typical surprise +13.3% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Tue, May 26$0.35 vs $0.32beat
- Wed, Mar 4$0.34 vs $0.31beat
- Mon, Dec 8$0.27 vs $0.22beat
- Tue, Aug 26$0.23 vs $0.20beat
- Wed, May 28$0.20 vs $0.18beat
- Tue, Mar 4$0.21 vs $0.16beat
Estimates and results for OOMA via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by OOMA officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $3.6m
0 trades
19 trades
- Yeh Jenny Csold
- Yeh Jenny Csold
- Stang Eric Bsold
- Yeh Jenny Csold
- Yeh Jenny Csold
- Stang Eric Bsold
- Mann Russellsold
- Mann Russellsold
81 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.