Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
100Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $383.80M | $85.60M | $0.54 |
| 2024 | $374.20M | $71.88M | $0.47 |
| 2023 | $327.62M | $118.40M | $0.80 |
| 2022 | $258.88M | $92.96M | $0.63 |
| 2021 | $235.51M | $122.48M | $0.90 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Tue, Nov 3(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $0.31 per share
Typical surprise +6.4% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Fri, Jul 31$0.32 vs $0.28beat
- Thu, May 7$0.27 vs $0.28miss
- Tue, Feb 3$0.50 vs $0.47beat
- Tue, Nov 4$0.30 vs $0.26beat
- Fri, Aug 1$0.24 vs $0.30miss
- Fri, May 2$0.23 vs $0.25miss
Estimates and results for PAX via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by PAX officers and directors.
- Bought
- $7.0m
- Sold
- —
14 trades
0 trades
- Neto Olimpio Matarazzobought
- Neto Olimpio Matarazzobought
- Neto Olimpio Matarazzobought
- Neto Olimpio Matarazzobought
- Neto Olimpio Matarazzobought
- Neto Olimpio Matarazzobought
- Neto Olimpio Matarazzobought
- Neto Olimpio Matarazzobought
68 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from PAX's reported EPS growth of -12.0% a year over 4 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.29
- Implied price
- $8.29
- Return from $11.50
- -6.3% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $4.12 — -64.1% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 21 | 25 | 29 | 33 | 37 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -22.0% | -22.2% | -19.4% | -17.0% | -14.8% | -12.8% |
| -17.0% | -17.2% | -14.2% | -11.7% | -9.3% | -7.2% |
| -12.0% | -12.2% | -9.1% | -6.3% | -3.9% | -1.7% |
| -7.0% | -7.2% | -3.9% | -1.0% | 1.6% | 3.9% |
| -2.0% | -2.2% | 1.3% | 4.3% | 7.0% | 9.5% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newsdefenseworld.net·6h ago·Neutral
Patria Investments (NYSE:PAX) vs. Sonim Technologies (NASDAQ:SONM) Head to Head Analysis Sonim Technologies (NASDAQ: SONM - Get Free Report) and Patria Investments (NYSE: PAX - Get Free Report) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership. Risk and Volatility Sonim Technologies has a
View source ↗