Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$105.11B+51.30%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Ichiro Nakayama
- Sector
- Technology
- Industry
- Software - Infrastructure
- Employees
- 1,994
- Beta
- 1.23
- Country
- JP
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.87
Financials
PAYP has only 8 quarterly periods on file — the charts below show the full history available.
Revenue
$105.11B+51.3%Net Income
$18.43B+98.7%EBITDA
$39.99B+211.2%Free Cash Flow
$-60.13B-126.6%EPS (diluted)
$27.21+73.1%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
677.14M+7.6%Operating Expenses
$24.80BCash & Debt
$490.39BReturn of Capital
$146.00MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$55.53BQuote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $403.62B | $121.97B | $191.74 |
| 2024 | $292.04B | $36.17B | $0.00 |
| 2023 | $248.01B | $-3.35B | $0.00 |
| 2022 | $197.21B | $-25.86B | $0.00 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $281.09
- Implied price
- $5,060
- Return from $16.98
- 212.5% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $2,516 — today's price is already 99.3% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | 161.5% | 173.4% | 183.5% | 192.4% | 200.3% |
| 3.0% | 174.8% | 187.3% | 198.0% | 207.3% | 215.7% |
| 8.0% | 188.1% | 201.3% | 212.5% | 222.3% | 231.0% |
| 13.0% | 201.5% | 215.2% | 226.9% | 237.2% | 246.3% |
| 18.0% | 214.8% | 229.2% | 241.4% | 252.1% | 261.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
93-28.21%Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·5h ago·Neutral
PayPay: Inorganic Moves To Capture Structural Tailwinds I initiate coverage of PayPay Corporation (PAYP) with a Buy, after assessing market trends and corporate developments. PAYP's alliance with Seven & i Holdings unlocks significant digital payment adoption potential in an underpenetrated Japanese market. Acquisition of a 70.2% stake in T&D Financial Life Insurance enables PAYP to leverage its 75M user base for cross-selling financial products, as more Japanese re-assess their wealth managemen…
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·9d ago·Positive
Does Paypay (PAYP) Have the Potential to Rally 47.37% as Wall Street Analysts Expect? The consensus price target hints at a 47.4% upside potential for Paypay (PAYP). While empirical research shows that this sought-after metric is hardly effective, an upward trend in earnings estimate revisions could mean that the stock will witness an upside in the near term.
View source ↗
Earnings
Typical surprise +21.7% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Fri, Jul 31$0.17 vs $0.15beat
- Wed, May 6$0.13 vs $0.10beat
Estimates and results for PAYP via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by PAYP officers and directors.
No open-market trades in the recent filings. All 35 recent Form 4 entries were share awards, option exercises or tax withholding — pay, not decisions to buy or sell.
35 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.