Price (90d)
No price history yet — the daily price refresh runs once a day.
Signal Score (90d)
107Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.74B | $2.65B | $0.43 |
| 2024 | $-19.85B | $-20.02B | $-6.54 |
| 2023 | $5.42B | $5.07B | $1.66 |
| 2022 | $5.44B | $5.49B | $1.76 |
| 2021 | $4.64B | $4.57B | $1.49 |
Social Signal Score
Earnings
Tue, Nov 10(in 3 months)
Consensus estimate $2.55 per share
Typical surprise +11.1% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Fri, Aug 7$-0.48 vs $0.29miss
- Thu, Mar 26$3.49 vs $3.22beat
- Tue, Nov 11$2.95 vs $2.59beat
- Wed, Aug 13$4.63 vs $2.41beat
Estimates and results for POAHY via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from POAHY's reported EPS growth of -26.7% a year over 4 years. Historical EPS growth of -27% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.38
- Implied price
- $3.46
- Return from $3.14
- 1.9% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $1.72 — -45.3% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -20.0% | -14.5% | -10.1% | -6.4% | -3.2% |
| -20.0% | -14.7% | -8.8% | -4.1% | -0.1% | 3.3% |
| -15.0% | -9.4% | -3.1% | 1.9% | 6.1% | 9.7% |
| -10.0% | -4.0% | 2.6% | 7.9% | 12.4% | 16.2% |
| -5.0% | 1.3% | 8.3% | 13.9% | 18.6% | 22.6% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Mentions (1)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·3d ago·Neutral
Ferrari Vs. Porsche: Why I Prefer Ferrari Despite Its Premium Valuation Ferrari earns my buy rating thanks to its scarcity-driven model, exceptional pricing power, strong margins, and increasingly valuable personalization business. Ferrari's premium valuation is justified by superior fundamentals, but its elevated multiples leave little room for slower growth or weaker luxury demand. Porsche earns a Hold rating as restructuring progress, strong liquidity, and improving profitability are offset b
View source ↗