Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$105.15M-99.71%Company Profile
- CEO
- Greg Savage
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Asset Management
- Beta
- 0.47
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 2 / 9 (Weak)
- Altman Z-score
- 2.34
Financials
Revenue
$105.15M-99.7%Net Income
$-9.92M-100.2%EBITDA
$-12.45M-100.3%Free Cash Flow
$-35.79MEPS (diluted)
$-0.44-269.2%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
22.50M-99.9%Operating Expenses
$18.44MCash & Debt
$6.40MReturn of Capital
$6.40MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$444.63MDividend per Share
$0.08Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | $443.70M | $5.84M | $0.26 |
| 2014 | $256.66M | $-6.99M | $-0.31 |
| 2013 | $270.23M | $4.41M | $0.22 |
| 2012 | $162.04M | $3.08M | $0.16 |
| 2011 | $130.01M | $24.05M | $1.27 |
| 2010 | $97.51M | $3.31M | $0.05 |
| 2009 | $102.54M | $4.30M | $0.09 |
| 2008 | $135.44M | $10.66M | $0.66 |
| 2007 | $111.11M | $-1.61M | $-0.10 |
| 2006 | $120.45B | $11.71B | $0.78 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from POWR's reported EPS growth of -11.5% a year over 9 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.14
- Implied price
- $2.54
- Return from $24.50
- -36.4% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $1.26 — -94.8% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -21.5% | -48.0% | -45.6% | -43.6% | -41.9% | -40.3% |
| -16.5% | -44.7% | -42.2% | -40.0% | -38.2% | -36.5% |
| -11.5% | -41.4% | -38.7% | -36.4% | -34.4% | -32.7% |
| -6.5% | -38.1% | -35.3% | -32.8% | -30.7% | -28.9% |
| -1.5% | -34.8% | -31.8% | -29.3% | -27.0% | -25.1% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
120+20.00%Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newszacks.com·5h ago·Positive
Is iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) a Strong ETF Right Now? A smart beta exchange traded fund, the iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) debuted on 01/31/2012, and offers broad exposure to the Utilities/Infrastructure ETFs category of the market.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·14d ago·Neutral
Should You Invest in the iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR)? Launched on January 31, 2012, the iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) is a passively managed exchange traded fund designed to provide a broad exposure to the Utilities - Infrastructure segment of the equity market.
View source ↗
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by POWR officers and directors.
- Bought
- —
- Sold
- $681k
0 trades
6 trades
- Collins Kevin Psold
- Collins Kevin Psold
- Collins Kevin Psold
- Collins Kevin Psold
- Collins Kevin Psold
- Collins Kevin Psold
33 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.
Congress trades
No disclosed congressional trades in POWR.
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.