Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Analyst Ratings
2 analystsRevenue
$7.36B-17.87%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Luca de Meo
- Sector
- Consumer Cyclical
- Industry
- Luxury Goods
- Employees
- 43,731
- Beta
- 1.00
- Country
- FR
- Piotroski score
- 7 / 9 (Strong)
- Altman Z-score
- 2.14
Financials
Revenue
$7.36B-17.9%Net Income
$192.75M-43.7%EBITDA
$1.97B+142.2%Free Cash Flow
$1.71B+242.4%EPS (diluted)
$0.16-42.9%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
1.23B+0.9%Operating Expenses
$4.33BCash & Debt
$8.48BReturn of Capital
$500.75MDividend per Share
$0.32Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $14.10B | $72.00M | $0.06 |
| 2024 | $17.19B | $1.13B | $0.92 |
| 2023 | $19.57B | $2.98B | $2.44 |
| 2022 | $20.35B | $3.61B | $2.93 |
| 2021 | $17.65B | $3.18B | $2.55 |
| 2020 | $13.10B | $2.15B | $1.72 |
| 2019 | $15.88B | $2.31B | $1.70 |
| 2018 | $13.67B | $3.71B | $2.10 |
| 2017 | $15.48B | $1.79B | $1.42 |
| 2016 | $12.38B | $813.50M | $0.65 |
| 2015 | $11.58B | $696.00M | $0.55 |
| 2014 | $10.04B | $528.90M | $0.42 |
| 2013 | $9.75B | $49.60M | $0.04 |
| 2012 | $9.74B | $1.05B | $0.83 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from PPRUY's reported EPS growth of -18.4% a year over 13 years. Historical EPS growth of -18% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.03
- Implied price
- $0.47
- Return from $23.49
- -54.2% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $0.23 — -99.0% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -62.8% | -61.1% | -59.6% | -58.4% | -57.2% |
| -20.0% | -60.3% | -58.5% | -56.9% | -55.6% | -54.4% |
| -15.0% | -57.8% | -55.9% | -54.2% | -52.8% | -51.5% |
| -10.0% | -55.3% | -53.3% | -51.6% | -50.0% | -48.7% |
| -5.0% | -52.8% | -50.7% | -48.9% | -47.3% | -45.8% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
50-61.54%Social Signal Score
Mentions (3)
- Newsreuters.com·6d ago·Neutral
Kering's de Meo says Italy remains key, rules out production shift Italy remains central to Kering's plans, with the French luxury group having no intention of moving production out of the country, Chief Executive Luca de Meo said on Wednesday.
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·53d ago·Negative
Kering: The Gucci Reset Is Becoming An Earnings Recovery Kering (KER.PA) is executing a turnaround, restoring its balance sheet, reducing retail footprint, and stabilizing Gucci's sales declines. Operational leverage is the key upside driver, with management cutting costs, rationalizing inventory, and focusing on store productivity to outpace consensus earnings recovery. Jewelry and eyewear segments are gaining traction, diversifying profit sources beyond Gucci, while cash flow and net debt have
View source ↗ - Newsseekingalpha.com·54d ago·Negative
Kering: Q2 Was Better, But Gucci Still Needs To Turn Around Kering remains a Hold as Q2 2026 showed meaningful improvement but not a full recovery, especially at Gucci. PPRUF's group revenue returned to growth after twelve quarters, with Gucci's decline narrowing, yet traffic and mainland China remain weak. Management expects roughly flat group growth in Q3; Gucci's new collections show promise, but Q3 is pivotal for confirming a turnaround.
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Feb 17(in 4 months)
Consensus estimate $0.35 per share
Typical surprise +0.0% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Tue, Jul 28$0.13 vs $0.35miss
- Tue, Feb 10$0.15 vs $0.28miss
- Tue, Jul 29$0.42 vs $0.40beat
- Tue, Feb 11$0.35 vs $0.33beat
- Wed, Jul 24$0.79 vs $0.79beat
- Thu, Feb 8$1.12 vs $1.19miss
Estimates and results for PPRUY via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Congress trades
- Josh S. Gottheimerhouse · NJ05 · disclosed Jan 7, 2024 (33d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
- Daniel Goldmanhouse · NY10 · disclosed Aug 13, 2023 (34d later)Sell$15,001 - $50,000
- Josh S. Gottheimerhouse · NJ05 · disclosed Jul 22, 2022 (24d later)Buy$1,001 - $15,000
- Josh S. Gottheimerhouse · NJ05 · disclosed Jul 22, 2022 (23d later)Buy$1,001 - $15,000
- Ro Khannahouse · CA17 · disclosed May 6, 2022 (30d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
- Ro Khannahouse · CA17 · disclosed May 6, 2022 (23d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
- Ro Khannahouse · CA17 · disclosed May 6, 2022 (28d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
- Greg Gianfortehouse · MT00 · disclosed Apr 7, 2020 (19d later)Buy$1,001 - $15,000
- Mikie Sherrillhouse · NJ11 · disclosed Jul 8, 2019 (41d later)Sell$1,001 - $15,000
Self-reported filings, amounts as brackets. Via Senate/House disclosures.