Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$2.03B+4.75%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- Stefan Larsson
- Sector
- Consumer Cyclical
- Industry
- Apparel - Manufacturers
- Employees
- 26,000
- Beta
- 1.75
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 2.22
Financials
Revenue
$2.03B+4.7%Net Income
$88.00M-2.8%EBITDA
$186.90M-25.4%Free Cash Flow
$-86.00M-135.4%EPS (diluted)
$1.90+71.2%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
46.40M-42.9%Operating Expenses
$1.07BCash & Debt
$592.50MReturn of Capital
$16.70MRevenue by Segment (annual)
$8.56BDividend per Share
$0.04Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $8.95B | $25.30M | $0.53 |
| 2024 | $8.65B | $598.50M | $10.69 |
| 2023 | $9.22B | $663.60M | $10.88 |
| 2022 | $9.02B | $200.40M | $3.05 |
| 2021 | $9.15B | $952.30M | $13.45 |
| 2020 | $7.13B | $-1.14B | $-15.98 |
| 2019 | $9.91B | $417.30M | $5.62 |
| 2018 | $9.66B | $746.40M | $9.76 |
| 2017 | $8.91B | $537.80M | $6.71 |
| 2016 | $8.20B | $549.00M | $6.85 |
| 2015 | $8.02B | $572.40M | $6.95 |
| 2014 | $8.24B | $439.00M | $5.33 |
| 2013 | $8.19B | $143.54M | $1.77 |
| 2012 | $6.04B | $433.84M | $6.16 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from PVH's reported EPS growth of -17.2% a year over 13 years. Historical EPS growth of -17% would project the company towards zero. Floored at -15% as a starting point.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.24
- Implied price
- $4.27
- Return from $76.14
- -43.8% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $2.12 — -97.2% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 12 | 15 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25.0% | -54.3% | -52.2% | -50.4% | -48.9% | -47.5% |
| -20.0% | -51.2% | -49.0% | -47.1% | -45.4% | -44.0% |
| -15.0% | -48.2% | -45.8% | -43.8% | -42.0% | -40.5% |
| -10.0% | -45.1% | -42.6% | -40.5% | -38.6% | -37.0% |
| -5.0% | -42.1% | -39.4% | -37.2% | -35.2% | -33.5% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
100-9.09%Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newszacks.com·6h ago·Neutral
PVH (PVH) Earnings Expected to Grow: What to Know Ahead of Next Week's Release PVH (PVH) doesn't possess the right combination of the two key ingredients for a likely earnings beat in its upcoming report. Get prepared with the key expectations.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·2d ago·Positive
PVH Strengthens Brand Support and Digital Capabilities for Growth PVH Corp. is leveraging iconic brands, AI, digital growth and the PVH+ Plan to strengthen consumer engagement and drive long-term growth.
View source ↗
Earnings
Wed, Sep 2(in 6 days)
Consensus estimate $3.08 per share
Typical surprise +11.4% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Wed, Jun 3$2.01 vs $1.82beat
- Tue, Mar 31$3.82 vs $3.30beat
- Wed, Dec 3$2.83 vs $2.54beat
- Tue, Aug 26$2.52 vs $1.97beat
- Wed, Jun 4$2.30 vs $2.26beat
- Mon, Mar 31$3.27 vs $3.19beat
Estimates and results for PVH via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by PVH officers and directors.
- Bought
- $1.0m
- Sold
- $643k
2 trades
3 trades
- Fischer Mark Dsold
- Fischer Mark Dsold
- Fischer Mark Dsold
- Larsson Stefanbought
- Andersen Jesperbought
95 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.