Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$55.28M+114.43%Company Profile
- CEO
- Adam Derechin
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Asset Management
- Employees
- 0
- Beta
- 1.44
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 6 / 9 (Middling)
- Altman Z-score
- 1.92
Financials
Revenue
$55.28M+114.4%Net Income
$-27.67M-114.7%EBITDA
$-10.04M-105.9%Free Cash Flow
$13.93M-58.1%EPS (diluted)
$-0.21-112.3%Shares Outstanding (diluted)
134.43M+22.1%Operating Expenses
$-8.76MCash & Debt
$10.05MReturn of Capital
$64.54MDividend per Share
$0.09Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $220.71M | $47.29M | $0.35 |
| 2024 | $88.09M | $98.61M | $0.74 |
| 2023 | $137.62M | $234.95M | $1.75 |
| 2022 | $160.40M | $-645.33M | $-4.80 |
| 2021 | $240.78M | $813.69M | $6.06 |
| 2020 | $90.56M | $-77.73M | $-0.40 |
| 2019 | $449.06M | $446.63M | $4.09 |
| 2018 | $-96.03M | $-98.57M | $-0.90 |
| 2017 | $125.40M | $123.44M | $1.13 |
| 2016 | $160.38M | $100.99M | $0.93 |
| 2015 | $167.05M | $95.16M | $0.87 |
| 2014 | $59.00M | $414.05M | $3.78 |
| 2013 | $52.45M | $36.55M | $0.33 |
| 2012 | $52.03M | $236.89M | $2.15 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
Seeded from RQI's reported EPS growth of -13.0% a year over 13 years.
- EPS in 5 years
- $0.18
- Implied price
- $5.79
- Return from $12.11
- -13.7% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $2.88 — -76.2% below today's price.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 23 | 28 | 33 | 38 | 43 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -23.0% | -29.0% | -26.1% | -23.6% | -21.5% | -19.5% |
| -18.0% | -24.4% | -21.3% | -18.7% | -16.4% | -14.3% |
| -13.0% | -19.7% | -16.5% | -13.7% | -11.3% | -9.0% |
| -8.0% | -15.1% | -11.7% | -8.8% | -6.2% | -3.8% |
| -3.0% | -10.5% | -6.9% | -3.8% | -1.1% | 1.4% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
113+40.63%Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newsseekingalpha.com·5h ago·Positive
RQI: A Wider Discount On A Growing NAV Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund remains a buy, offering an 8.8% yield and trading at a 7.17% discount to NAV. RQI's NAV growth and improved dividend coverage are supported by strong net realized gains and proactive portfolio shifts toward data centers and healthcare. Leverage (28% of assets) amplifies returns but increases risk if interest rates rise or real estate weakens; 71% of leverage is fixed-rate, and 29% variable.
View source ↗ - Newsprnewswire.com·7d ago·Negative
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. (RQI) Notification of Sources of Distribution Under Section 19(a) NEW YORK, Aug. 28, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- This press release provides shareholders of Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. (NYSE: RQI) (the "Fund") with information regarding the sources of the distribution to be paid on August 31, 2026 and cumulative distributions paid fiscal year-to-date. In December 2012, the Fund implemented a managed distribution policy in accordance wi…
View source ↗
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by RQI officers and directors.
- Bought
- $145k
- Sold
- $102k
11 trades
8 trades
- Zaharis-nikas Elainesold
- Kirschner Mathewbought
- Maginnis Gerald J.sold
- Rogers-windsor Ramona Lynnbought
- Magpiong Jane F.bought
- Rogers-windsor Ramona Lynnbought
- Rogers-windsor Ramona Lynnbought
- Rogers-windsor Ramona Lynnbought
81 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.