Price
No data yet.
Social Signal Score
Revenue
$-8.23M-250434.55%Analyst Estimates
Consensus estimates, not results. Via Financial Modeling Prep.
Company Profile
- CEO
- David R. Spreng
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Financial - Credit Services
- Employees
- 500
- Beta
- 0.60
- Country
- US
- Piotroski score
- 3 / 9 (Weak)
- Altman Z-score
- 0.28
Financials
Revenue
$-8.23M-250434.5%Net Income
$27.19MEBITDA
$40.19M+8905.6%Free Cash Flow
$-192.41M-111210.0%EPS (diluted)
$0.65Shares Outstanding (diluted)
42.07M+12459.6%Operating Expenses
$1.05MCash & Debt
$10.83MReturn of Capital
$15.46MDividend per Share
$0.33Quote
Valuation & Ratios
Returns & Efficiency
Revenue & Net Income (Annual)
| Fiscal Year | Revenue | Net Income | EPS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $140.16M | $34.05M | $0.93 |
| 2024 | $124.22M | $73.61M | $1.89 |
| 2023 | $94.52M | $44.34M | $1.09 |
| 2022 | $55.14M | $32.25M | $0.79 |
| 2021 | $54.00M | $45.62M | $1.33 |
| 2020 | $52.44M | $46.98M | $1.14 |
| 2019 | $32.88M | $27.65M | $0.67 |
| 2018 | $14.58M | $11.76M | $0.28 |
| 2017 | $3.19M | $-1.44M | $-0.51 |
| 2016 | $0.00 | $-903.0K | $-83.82 |
Valuation
Project earnings forward and see what return today's price implies.
EPS was negative in at least one boundary year, so a compound growth rate can't be computed from it. Set your own assumption.
- EPS in 5 years
- $1.36
- Implied price
- $13.63
- Return from $6.62
- 15.6% a year
To earn 15.0% a year on these assumptions you'd need to buy at $6.78 — today's price is already 2.4% below that.
How sensitive is that answer?
Annual return across nearby assumptions. If the result is only attractive in one corner, that is the finding.
| growth \ P/E | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 14 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.0% | -5.3% | 0.3% | 4.9% | 8.7% | 12.2% |
| 3.0% | -0.5% | 5.4% | 10.2% | 14.3% | 17.9% |
| 8.0% | 4.3% | 10.5% | 15.6% | 19.8% | 23.6% |
| 13.0% | 9.2% | 15.6% | 20.9% | 25.4% | 29.3% |
| 18.0% | 14.0% | 20.7% | 26.3% | 30.9% | 35.0% |
This is arithmetic on assumptions you chose, not a forecast or a recommendation. It ignores dividends, buybacks, share issuance and debt, and it assumes a company still earning money in 5 years. Change any input and the answer changes a lot — that sensitivity is the honest result, not a flaw in the model.
Signal Score (90d)
110Social Signal Score
Mentions (2)
- Newszacks.com·6h ago·Neutral
Surging Earnings Estimates Signal Upside for Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) Stock Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) shares have started gaining and might continue moving higher in the near term, as indicated by solid earnings estimate revisions.
View source ↗ - Newszacks.com·8h ago·Positive
Wall Street Analysts See a 30.09% Upside in Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY): Can the Stock Really Move This High? The mean of analysts' price targets for Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) points to a 30.1% upside in the stock. While this highly sought-after metric has not proven reasonably effective, strong agreement among analysts in raising earnings estimates does indicate an upside in the stock.
View source ↗
Earnings
Thu, Nov 5(in 2 months)
Consensus estimate $0.33 per share
Typical surprise -2.6% (median, so one quarter with a near-zero estimate can't distort it)
- Thu, Aug 6$0.43 vs $0.29beat
- Thu, May 7$0.29 vs $0.31miss
- Thu, Mar 12$0.32 vs $0.36miss
- Thu, Nov 6$0.43 vs $0.38beat
- Thu, Aug 7$0.38 vs $0.39miss
- Mon, May 12$0.42 vs $0.36beat
Estimates and results for RWAY via Financial Modeling Prep. Beating consensus says the company cleared the bar analysts set, not that the business grew.
Insider trading
Open-market buys and sells by RWAY officers and directors.
- Bought
- $5.6m
- Sold
- $163.0m
61 trades
14 trades
- Spreng R Davidbought
- Thomson Carmelabought
- Raterman Thomas B.bought
- Spreng R Davidbought
- Raterman Thomas B.bought
- Raterman Thomas B.bought
- Carlson Capital, L.p.sold
- Ocm Growth Holdings Llcsold
25 further Form 4 entries are share awards, option exercises or shares withheld for tax. Those are compensation, not trades, so they are excluded above. Buying is the stronger signal: an insider spends their own money for one reason. Selling has many innocent explanations — tax, diversifying, a house — so it says far less than it appears to. Via SEC filings.